Few countries have undergone as much damage at the hands of a single leader as Equatorial Guinea. While we can only make educated guesses about what might have happened otherwise, it seems pretty safe to say that the country was almost single-handedly ruined by one man: Francisco Macías Nguema.
Coming to power in 1969 after the only free and fair election Equatorial Guinea has ever seen, Macías somehow managed to make independence from Francoist Spain look like a terrible mistake. Though Macías is fairly obscure as far as dictators go, he's on the short list for the title of worst dictator in African history after one accounts for resources, which is almost impressive considering the... "distinguished" competition he has. Human rights abuses and economic mismanagement are sadly a fact of life in much of Africa, but Macías almost seemed like he was trying to speedrun through the milestones of tyranny: vote rigging, kleptocracy, brutal executions, a cult of personality, objectively insane laws, kangaroo courts, anti-intellectualism, torture, starvation, ethnic cleansing, religious persecution; you name it, he did it. By the time of his 1979 overthrow in a coup led by his own nephew, at least 50,000 people were dead and 100,000 had fled the country, which are big numbers considering Equatorial Guinea's population was only 300,000-400,000. The man was basically an African Pol Pot, and his brutal reign of terror left a legacy of tyranny that continues to this day.
What if Macías had never come to power? Would Equatorial Guinea be an African success story? Or would it have still suffered badly, if not as horrifically as OTL?
Coming to power in 1969 after the only free and fair election Equatorial Guinea has ever seen, Macías somehow managed to make independence from Francoist Spain look like a terrible mistake. Though Macías is fairly obscure as far as dictators go, he's on the short list for the title of worst dictator in African history after one accounts for resources, which is almost impressive considering the... "distinguished" competition he has. Human rights abuses and economic mismanagement are sadly a fact of life in much of Africa, but Macías almost seemed like he was trying to speedrun through the milestones of tyranny: vote rigging, kleptocracy, brutal executions, a cult of personality, objectively insane laws, kangaroo courts, anti-intellectualism, torture, starvation, ethnic cleansing, religious persecution; you name it, he did it. By the time of his 1979 overthrow in a coup led by his own nephew, at least 50,000 people were dead and 100,000 had fled the country, which are big numbers considering Equatorial Guinea's population was only 300,000-400,000. The man was basically an African Pol Pot, and his brutal reign of terror left a legacy of tyranny that continues to this day.
What if Macías had never come to power? Would Equatorial Guinea be an African success story? Or would it have still suffered badly, if not as horrifically as OTL?