WI: No Royal Air Force

[Some Bloke]

Today is the anniversary of the formation of the RAF.
How would things be different if Britain never had an independent Air Force?

 

[The Kiat]

Britain would have two air services then; one ran by the army and the other by the navy. I suppose it has two air services anyway, with carriers and all, but that part about the ground-based aircraft being under army control stands.

 

[Some Bloke]

Any other thoughts from anyone, procurement, doctrine etc?

 

[Just Leo]

The formation of the RAF meant the establishment of the Air Ministry. That's one point against. The dissolution of the RNAS, another point against. The same rectal chasms fomented doctrine, so no change there. The uniforms were still itchy wolly, but blue. The RAF was formed as a force to blow countries to bits, Orwell-style, but Americans achieved the same goal with an army air force.

 

[Incognitia]

More emphasis on tactical air than strategic bombing; maritime patrol; and carrier air power.

In other words, a lot better than OTL!

 

[MattII]

With some damn politician not telling the Royal Navy what and what not to do for aircraft the people who actually run the ships can buy the aircraft that best suit them.