Have you worked Atari today?

* “International Business Machines Corp. signed a contract today to acquire the privately-held Atari, Inc. for cash and debentures…” – New York Times, 1976

“Computer industry insiders wonder whether IBM is making a wise move. Unlike microcomputer companies like MITS, Atari does not sell general-purpose computers, but specialized gaming machines that are much cheaper. Some industry insiders, including a Burroughs executive who spoke with Business Week on the condition of anonymity, feel that IBM will have a hard time moving Atari towards computing.” – Business Week magazine on the Atari takeover

“Nolan Bushnell, founder and head of Atari, Inc., the gaming company recently purchased by International Business Machines Corp., announced that he would resign from the company effective at the end of the month… Mr. Bushnell has not given a reason, but sources close to Atari say that the cause is disagreements with Atari’s new parent company…” – New York Times, July 1977

“Now you can play most all the video games you’d ever want to play. Introducing the Atari Video Computer System… but you can get more cartridges that have: tank games, space war games…” – A 1977 advertisement from Sears touting Atari’s Video Computer System

“Even though IBM claimed they trusted the people at Atari, there were conflicts. Atari engineers have claimed that IBM wanted to move the system from the 8-bit 6502 chips, similar to the VCS, to a 16-bit chip developed at Intel, which would have dramatically raised the price of the system. While Atari won the day there, they had to compromise on other issues... A major IBM decision was to make all the specifications, including the Serial I/O port, publicly available, ensuring a wide variety of third-party accessories.” – Microcomputers: A History, 1992

“The Atari division of International Business Machines Corp. announced today the release of two new microcomputers based on the MOS 6502 processor: Atari 800 and IBM Atari 1600. The 800 is designed for a home audience, with 8KB of RAM, and an ‘all-in-one’ form factor with a rubberized spill-proof keyboard. The more expensive 1600 features a desktop case with a separated keyboard, and with 16KB of RAM and the backing of IBM, seems primed to bring gaming pioneer Atari into the workplace.” – “Atari announces new computers”, New York Times, 1978

“Activision, Inc., a start-up which hoped to produce games for the Atari VCS… announced today that it would have no choice but to cease operations following the court’s decision.” – “Court declares for Atari”, New York Times, 1980

Atari v. Activision is sometimes held as a primary culprit of the video game collapse of 1983. Both Mattel and Coleco followed Atari’s lead, hoping to realize huge profits by controlling games and the console. However, personal computers had more power, better graphics, and wide ranges of software. Once they came down in price, it is unlikely anything could have saved the older consoles. Except, perhaps, for the ‘Video System X’…” – Racing the Beam: A Retrospective of Atari’s VCS, 2004

“A picture of the Video System X prototype. This system would have utilized the GTIA, ANTIC, and POKEY chips from the Atari 800/1600, but without the keyboard or operating system of the latter. But IBM killed the project; they believed the dedicated video game console was nothing more than an extremely simple computer, and that releasing a machine inferior to the existing machines would confuse the market.” – Atari Museum.com

“In 1981, seeing the lowered prices of RAM, Atari raised both its 8-bit models to the full 48KB of RAM, which eliminated the need to purchase add-on chips. This would prove to be insufficient, however, for what would be announced in 1982.
The first hit on Atari’s dominance was the announcement of the Commodore 64, which dramatically undercut the Atari 800. At its announcement, the IBM executives were said to dismiss, believing that the Atari machines were a ‘real computers’ while the Commodore was a glorified gaming system. Atari engineers, however, saw what was going to happen, and sales of the Atari 800 soon reflected their worst fears.” – Microcomputers: A History, 1992

“Intel Corporation announced today that it had signed a definitive contract to acquire the Western Design Center, which produces chip designs related to the 6502 processor used in the IBM Atari machines, as well as by Apple and other companies…” – New York Times, June 5, 1982

“The 8086 was, by all accounts, better than the 6502. But IBM had gone with the 6502, so Andy said was going to be the standard, and so we had to own it.” – Anonymous Intel employee, on the WDC acquisition

“The problem IBM faced with the 1600 was that it was, at its core, an 8-bit machine, doomed to be outclassed by the upcoming 16-bit machines based on processors like Intel’s 8086 and Motorola’s 68000. On the other hand, these processors were not compatible with the MOS 6502, so all software would have to be re-written. But the Western Design Center, later a subsidiary of Intel, changed that with the 65c816 processor they had in development. In August of 1982, the 800 and 1600 were replaced by the 800XC and 1600XC machines, which had much cheaper case and motherboard designs, and then Atari was ordered to cease all development of future 6502 machines in favor of the new 65c816-based Charlotte project.” – Microcomputers: A History, 1992

“The Qualic Computer Corporation is proud to announce the Qualic Light, a portable personal computer running CP/M on Intel 16-bit processors, faster than IBM Atari.” – November 1982 press release

“IBM announced dramatic cuts to their profit expectations for 1983, mostly due to losses by the Sunnyvale, California-based Atari division, which is responsible for not only the VCS video game console, but also IBM’s entry into the growing personal computer division. An IBM representative stated that ‘dramatic changes’ would be put in place to ensure future profitability.” – Forbes Magazine

“Atari, Inc. was to be dissolved into the parent company, and the offices would henceforth be known as IBM Sunnyvale. The dying VCS had the plug pulled, and IBM sold the rest of the video game divisions to Warner Communications, where it became Warner Games.
The decisions were not well-received by Atari, who saw IBM’s stifling control as the problem. A group of engineers, led by Jay Miner, left the company in 1983 rather than sign new employment contracts, and formed what became known as the Lorraine Corporation.” – Microcomputers: A History, 1992

“IBM’s Atari division has had a tough year. It’s lost the product that made it a household name, the VCS. However, it feels it can reclaim business market share from companies like Osborne with its newest machine, the IBM Atari/PC, which is the first computer to be powered by the powerful 16-bit Intel 65816, and features the Microsoft XENIX operating system, with compatibility with older IBM Atari diskettes and software via an emulation layer or optional add-in card. For home users, the IBM Atari/jr features the same 16-bit processor, but reduced RAM and an updated version of the Atari DOS operating system.” – New York Times, December 1983

“Introducing Macintosh. See why 1984 won’t be like ‘1984’.” – Apple Computer’s famous advertisement, January 22, 1984

“BUSINESS BRIEFS: SANTA CLARA, California - Lorraine Corporation, a privately-held startup consisting primarily of former IBM employees, announced today it had hired a new CEO, former Commodore International head Jack Tramiel.” – New York Times, April 4, 1984

“The Atari PC architecture radically changed things. The GTIA, ANTIC, POKEY combination had successfully stifled cloners. But the new system had a single graphics chip, the SGA (Single Graphics Adaptor), with off-the-shelf chips and a third-party operating system that Microsoft and SCO already sold to other OEMs. This was cheaper than the custom architecture of the older machines, but it also meant that for closers all they needed was a third-party chip that could duplicate the functions of CGA, and AMD was willing to provide with their Am3950. Their first customer was none other than Commodore International.” – Microcomputers: A History

“Within a year, we’re going to release a new computer that will far surpass anything we’re making now; it’ll run everything the new Atari will run, plus CP/M and everything else.” – Rod Canion’s infamous boast in December of 1984, as quoted in the 1987 essay The Qualic Effect. Nowadays considered apocryphal.

“[IBM submits that it has been] irreparably harmed by [AMD]’s willful infringement of IBM patents and copyrighted materials... [IBM requests that] the court issue an immediate restraining order preventing AMD from selling any infringing microprocessors to prevent further harm to IBM.”– IBM Brief, International Business Machines Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et. al. (1985). The motion was not granted, and IBM would go on to lose the case.

“In 1985, the final major player in the 16-bit market came into view: the Lorraine Amiga. Architecturally, the Amiga was much more of a successor to the IBM-Atari machines than the Atari/PC was, depending on a custom chipset. Like the Macintosh, it had a GUI, though some criticized it as less advanced. Lorraine executives pushed the multimedia capability of the machine. While the Macintosh had the earliest desktop publishing software, it was on the Lorraine machines that it really took off.
Very quickly, Atari DOS’s menu-based interface looked hopelessly outdated, and XENIX’s command-line seemed incomprehensible. Microsoft and SCO delayed the XENIX 2.0 project to early 1986 in order to address these concerns.” – Microcomputers: A History

“Digital Research, Inc., the company behind the CP/M operating system, announced today the availability of GEM/1, a window manager and disk operating system targeted at the Atari/jr, which gives Atari’s cheaper machine graphics capabilities not dissimilar from Apple's Macintosh.” – Boston Globe, July 1985
 
So what happens to Jay Miner (responsible for designing theTIA chip at the heart of the Atari 2600 (and later the Amiga)) in this scenario?
 
So what happens to Jay Miner (responsible for designing theTIA chip at the heart of the Atari 2600 (and later the Amiga)) in this scenario?
His course for now has actually been quite similar- he's still involved with TTL's Amiga. (The main difference is that Amiga is an independent company rather than being bought out by Commodore, and was designed as a computer from the beginning, since the video game market is seen as even more dead than it was at this point OTL)
 
Wasn't Steve Jobs working for Atari at the time this buyout took place? The idea of him working for IBM just made me head explodes rather messily...
 
Posting these updates terrifies me... I hope you like it, and if you don't... be gentle :p

------

“Nintendo released the Famicom as a computer system, with a keyboard and an available yet simplistic BASIC programming cartridge. But it quickly became clear that this machine was all about the games… the Japanese market had been unaffected by Atari v. Activision, and Japanese console manufacturers accepted third-party gamers who met their strict conditions. But these conditions were not enough to prevent extreme violence on the consoles… Unlike the older American consoles which focused on adapting sports like table tennis, the Japanese brought with them fighting and violence.” – No Clean Hobby: The Menace of Video Gaming, Alliance for the American Family, 2004

“This is a rare prototype of the Apple //gx. It would have shared the 65816 chip used by the IBM Atari/PC and the first Atari-compatible PCs. Early boards had better sound capability, but this was removed at the insistence of Apple’s lawyers due to concerns with the company’s agreement with record label Apple Corps. The machine was later cancelled altogether, effectively sealing the fate of the popular Apple II lineup despite Apple’s public claims to the contrary… around the same time Steve Jobs was forced out of the company.” – oldcomputers.com

“Microsoft hoped to change the UNIX landscape with Premiere, even forming a partnership with Sun Microsystems. However, in 1987 MIT released X11 without cost and made the source code available, while Premiere remained a proprietary product… XENIX 2.0 would be the last version of XENIX to be released jointly by SCO and Microsoft, as Microsoft wanted total control of its best-selling product.” – Microcomputers, A History, 1992

“…Premiere is simply not ready for its premier. Compared to the interface of the Macintosh or the Amiga, it is primitive, and forces users to go to the UNIX command line for what should be trivial tasks… It shows all the signs of being rushed to market.” – Computers Magazine, Jun 1986

“People talk about the Commodore 128 as the creator of the Atari-compatible. But what people don’t realize is that was just a hedge- it supported all the old Commodore 64 software, and that was all Commodore really cared about. The real pioneer was the Osborne Vixen- people don’t realize it today, but it took balls to throw away CP/M.” – Message board post, classicatari.com

“Vixen? Don’t make me laugh. A fifty-pound box called a ‘portable’? There’s a reason they started selling desktops. The IBM Atari/Portable blew that thing dead out of the water.” – Response, classicatari.com [Note that, as with many internet arguments, there is hyperbole involved, and the Osborne Vixen was not fifty pounds]

“Commodore has really pulled it off here. The new 32-bit Intel i2816 processor is by itself a huge improvement over former models, and it stunning that Commodore got it to market before IBM. And at the price points Commodore is pushing, there’s no reason to buy from IBM if you want an Atari.” – Computers Magazine, Oct 1986

“IBM Atari today launched a major update to its Atari/PC lineup. Even the cheapest model, the IBM Atari/PCjr, comes with XENIX and Premiere standard, which is a welcome step-up from the old DOS and could keep people from switching to Macintosh or Amiga.” – “IBM Launches New Machines”, The Boston Globe, Dec 1986

“The Amiga L-series. From the affordable all-in-one Amiga LE, to the professional and powerful Amiga LT, there’s an Amiga for everyone.” – Lorraine Corp. advertising campaign, 1987

“The Macintosh FX is a big step forward for the Macintosh line… Unlike Lorraine, Apple is pointing its sights to higher prices, hoping people will pay for more power and Apple’s ease-of-use. But Apple is taking a page from Lorraine as well as Atari in other ways, with the new ‘modular’ layout which is also becoming dominant in the Atari-compatible space.” – Computers Magazine, Jun 1987

“In addition, we plan to become the sole source for future NA-32 chip generations by closing out legacy ‘second source’ agreements” – Intel internal strategy document, 1988

“The Atari-compatibles, as the term became used, consisted not only of legacy companies like Commodore and Osborne, but also provided opportunities to new companies like Michael Dell’s Turbo Computer. Some established companies couldn’t keep up. Kaypro, in particular, had made their name selling not only a CP/M-based computer, but a software package as well… they were gone by the end of the decade.” – Microcomputers: A History, 1992

“Control Video Corporation is proud to announce that its Link-Line network services will now be available for both Lorraine Amiga and the XENIX operating system, joining the existing Commodore 64 and Apple Macintosh AppleLink products.” – Control Video press release, 1988 (the company would later change its name to LinkAmerica)

“MAYNARD, Massachusetts - The Digital Equipment Corporation announced today that it would acquire the Osborne Computer Corporation of Fremont, California… the decision brings together one of the most revered names in computing with one of the largest makers of Atari-compatible microcomputers, and marks a major shift in strategy for Digital… Adam Osborne, who recently was cleared in an SEC investigation dating back to 1983, will join Digital’s board… “– Boston Globe, Oct 1988

“…Lorraine appears to be on track to surpass Apple’s Macintosh line in number of total units sold… However, the real story here is the dramatic rise of the Atari-compatibles. Along with IBM’s Atari PCs, they now form the largest part of the market.” – “1988 Computer Sales Rise”, New York Times, Dec 1988

“After leaving Apple, Steve Jobs bought the Lucasfilm Graphics Group, and renamed it Pixar… He also founded another start-up, neXT computer Inc., which despite a rapid startup and a logo designed by the famed Paul Rand, ran out of funding due to delays in releasing their workstation, mostly caused by delays in writing a new operating system… ” - Insanely Great: The Apple Macintosh and its Legacy, 2008

“In January of 1989, IBM announced the Personal Computer/3. Notably void of any Atari branding, this machine could not be called an ‘Atari compatible’, introducing new ports rather than the Serial I/O and other Atari/PC standards. It was intended to ship with a new operating system designed in house, but due to delays it shipped with XENIX 2.1 and Premiere… These machines are still on sale today, but have not reached the expected sales or market domination for a number of reasons.” – Microcomputers: A History, 1992

“Announcing the new generation of Amiga: The XL-series. Featuring advanced audio capability and high-speed processors, while retaining the quality and affordability you’d expect from Lorraine.” – Lorraine advertisement, 1989

“When the XL came out, we had not only a low-end XLE machine, but the old LE remained in production… and that was a decision that came from [Lorraine CEO] Jack Tramiel himself… the bean-counters wanted to wipe out all the low-end models, they said it was killing the towers and the upper-end models… but he was insistent, he pulled out the old Commodore motto…” – An anonymous insider quoted in Inside Lorraine, 2007

“Apple Computer today filed suit against Lorraine Corp., arguing the GUI of the Amiga Workbench operating system violated Apple copyrights…” – Boston Globe, Jun 1989

“Microsoft XENIX 3/2, featuring XENIX 3.0 and Microsoft Premiere 2.1, is optimized for your 32-bit Intel processor. It features an easy to use interface, built on the world’s most powerful operating system, AT&T UNIX System V.” – Microsoft advertisement, 1989

“In 1988, Richard Stallman, the founder of the Free Software Foundation, published an essay, ‘Why UNIX needs to be free’, arguing that if the UNIX vendors remained on their current course they would end up in thrall to Microsoft. XENIX 3/2, which rejected the improvements of System V Release 3 in favor of Microsoft’s in-house extensions to UNIX, seemed to confirm his worst fears. XENIX was already the most popular form of UNIX in use… it has been claimed is USENET conversations that [releasing UNIX source publicly] was actually brought up during discussions of the so-called ‘Unix System Unification’ going on between AT&T and Sun, but was rejected by AT&T.” – Microcomputers: A History, 1992

“So what’s it like to use XENIX 3/2? In the first version of Premiere, Microsoft, perhaps playing off the UNIX idea that ‘everything is a file’, put front and center a file manager called the XENIX Executive. That hasn’t changed. Unlike Macintosh and Amiga, windows are tiled, maximized, or iconized, they cannot overlap. That also hasn’t changed… But what has changed is that the whole system runs with a lot more polish. For example, the icon area is now more compact, and features a system clock… There’s a command line in the XENIX Executive for quickly typing in commands for those UNIX programs not yet rewritten for Premiere.” – Computers Magazine, Apr 1989

“West Chester, PA-based Commodore International, Maynard, MA-based Digital Equipment Corp., and Austin, Texas-based Turbo-Computer Inc. announced today the formation of the Compatible Architecture Technology (CAT) group, in order to ‘create new solutions as a superset of current industry standards’… This is widely believed to be a response to the IBM Personal Computer/3, whose patented designs are difficult for the clone companies to duplicate.” – Business Week

“In July 1989 AT&T and Sun released UNIX System V Release 4... At the same time, Apple announced that they would port the new OS to the Motorola 68k to run on Macintosh computers. What they didn’t announce was that there was a massive secret effort undergoing at the company… to port the Macintosh system software to a compatibility layer built on top of A/UX.” – Insanely Great: The Apple Macintosh and its Legacy, 2008
 
So, since the 65816 and its descendants live in this timeline (and their architecture will permit them to have a much better Instructions-Per-Clock Ratio than x86 or 680x0), will ARM still happen? Or will RISC-OS come out on an "Intel" architecture? Will "x816" continue past the early '90s like x86 today, or will it be superceded by 860/960 or Itanium?

Did OTL MSX Computers in Japan instead become Atari PC Clones which replaced ANTIC, POKEY, and C/GTIA with apporpriate chips from Texas Instruments/Yamaha, Hitachi, and General Instruments?

Since Atari/IBM, Lorraine, and Apple look to be in slightly better market shape, and Digital Equipment is now a cloner, I suspect that instead of going Power PC (which will probably die since there is no case for it, the Z series powering the 3x0 series mainframes, servers and supercomputers can handle the high end, and Intel/AMD/Cryx/Centaur/VIA/Evergreen can handle the low end) Lorraine and Apple go with MIPS, SPARC, or Hitachi Super H when Motorola is forced to drop out? Will we still get Alpha powered DECStations? Will the embedded/ultraportable market be stuck with 65C02 descendant "Atoms" and Zilog, Freescale, and Microchip Technologies microcontrollers?

For that matter, what happened to the Texas Instruments powered (First by an upclocked version of the TMS 9900 used in the 99/4A, Then by the TMS 32000 Series DSPs) Thompson Net Computers, the Sharp X68000, The NEC PC83/88/98 powered by the V Series, which were in-house designed x86 clones, the Fujitsu FM Towns, and the Sony NEWS (Which went from 680x0 to MIPS and finally to Power PC {mirroring Playstation hardware designs} before being discontinued in favor of Workstation Class VAIOs powered by Intel and AMD server chips)?

Inquiring minds want to know!
 
Last edited:
So, since the 65816 and its descendants live in this timeline (and their architecture will permit them to have a much better Instructions-Per-Clock Ratio than x86 or 680x0), will ARM still happen? Or will RISC-OS come out on an "Intel" architecture? Will "x816" continue past the early '90s like x86 today, or will it be superceded by 860/960 or Itanium?
As you note, 6502 was not truly RISC, but has been called "RISC-like", and so it's questionable whether ARM will happen, or gain the prominence of OTL...

On the other hand, of course, ARM is directly tied to Acorn Computer. And they started what became ARM way back in 1983. So a lot will rest on how they go...
Did OTL MSX Computers in Japan instead become Atari PC Clones which replaced ANTIC, POKEY, and C/GTIA with apporpriate chips from Texas Instruments/Yamaha, Hitachi, and General Instruments?
The problem is that most of my knowledge is the US market- what I'm thinking of doing is perhaps, rather than moving right to the 90's, to do an update looking outside of the US. (Especially Europe and Japan)

MSX is a question, since in OTL I believe CP/M compatibility was a desired element? And CP/M machines here do a little better. So it could well remain on the Z80 for that purpose. (How does "DSX" sound?
Since Atari/IBM, Lorraine, and Apple look to be in slightly better market shape, and Digital Equipment is now a cloner, I suspect that instead of going Power PC (which will probably die since there is no case for it, the Z series powering the 3x0 series mainframes, servers and supercomputers can handle the high end, and Intel/AMD/Cryx/Centaur/VIA/Evergreen can handle the low end) Lorraine and Apple go with MIPS, SPARC, or Hitachi Super H when Motorola is forced to drop out? Will we still get Alpha powered DECStations? Will the embedded/ultraportable market be stuck with 65C02 descendant "Atoms" and Zilog, Freescale, and Microchip Technologies microcontrollers?
This is going into the 90's, of course... I've been looking at various options... in OTL Commodore's Amiga was planning to shift to the HP PA-RISC processor rather than PowerPC (the post-Commodore AmigaOS runs on PowerPC though, but that's because "Hombre" was never released). But on the other hand, sometimes I wonder if the 68k line could survive longer... A lot of possibilities.

As for the DECstations... well, Digital bought a company that makes UNIX-powered machines... but not the same level. Actually, they'd probably get more internal support here, since Digital moving into cloning seems to carry an implication they'll have less of an aversion to outside-developed technologies. (Which means that my update doesn't adequately cover all of 1989- curses!)
For that matter, what happened to the Texas Instruments powered (First by an upclocked version of the TMS 9900 used in the 99/4A, Then by the TMS 32000 Series DSPs) Thompson Net Computers, the Hitachi X68000, The NEC PC83/88/98 powered by the V Series, which were in-house designed x86 clones, the Fujitsu FM Towns, and the Sony NEWS (Which went from 680x0 to MIPS and finally to Power PC {mirroring Playstation hardware designs} before being discontinued in favor of Workstation Class VAIOs powered by Intel and AMD server chips)?
I would gather that machines like the FM Towns would likely end up on in-house "x816" clones. I believe NEC had worked with WDC in the past, so you could see them making in-house versions of these chips as well.
Inquiring minds want to know?
Good to hear! Sorry I can't answer everything as of yet.
 
I just realised something:

The NEC PC Engine/Turbografx-16 in TTL will be based on actual NEC PC Technology, but consoles will be in much worse shape.

Maybe instead, they sell it as an integrated computer graphics and sound integrated chipset card for PC Compatibles (at least in Europe, India, and Australia {PAL Markets} and the US {Different chip voltage standards}) as a competitor to both VGA and the original SoundBlaster?
 
I just realised something:

The NEC PC Engine/Turbografx-16 in TTL will be based on actual NEC PC Technology, but consoles will be in much worse shape.

Maybe instead, they sell it as an integrated computer graphics and sound integrated chipset card for PC Compatibles (at least in Europe, India, and Australia {PAL Markets} and the US {Different chip voltage standards}) as a competitor to both VGA and the original SoundBlaster?
Yeah, ironically for a TL with "Atari" in the name, video games are quite a bit worse off :p

An integrated console-as-card is an interesting idea... such things existed for the later PC-FX, but that was a development module, not the primary mode of console distribution...
 
I keep going back and forth on so many things with this, minor rewrites all over, should I go into more detail, isn't this really too much detail, does this really make sense, is this market too small for anyone to care about, would people really put up with this kind of thing...

I'm sorry if there are flaws, but at some point one just has to post things...
________

Have you worked Atari today? Part III

“ASCII Microsoft, along with a group of Japan’s leading hardware makers, announced the MSX standard in 1983. It was based on the Zilog Z80 processor, and ran CP/MSX. Microsoft licensed the CP/M operating system from Digital Research, and then added their own upgrades, including an improved command scheme that replaced CP/M’s cryptic commands with easier to remember commands.” – Microcomputers: A History, 1992

“This ‘Sega Mega System’, a variant of the SG-1000 Mark III, is identical to those sold in Europe and Latin America, but a closer look will reveal it to be a rare US-bound prototype. In the end, Sega decided not to sell the system in America.” – protoworld.org

“A prototype Acorn Astrolabe. This was Acorn’s last model line to not be explicitly Atari-compatible, however, since it used the same i2816-derived processors, expansion cards were available to turn it into an Atari-compatible machine. They were quite popular; at one point a survey found that Astrolabes equipped with such cards made Acorn the largest Atari-compatible vendor in the UK.” – oldcomputers.com

“’That’s right, we have the most powerful gaming machine on the market, the Outdatacom. With 8-bits, you have the most powerful system on the market.’ ‘That’s not true!’ ‘JOHNNY TURBO!’… ‘Oh wow! These Outdatacoms are so lame, but the TurboEngine games have the arcade feel!’” – excerpts from a NEC advertising campaign for the TurboEngine, 1988

“Unexpectedly, considering its originals as a mere graphical hack, The Adventure of Johnny Turbo was one of the best-selling games for the TurboEngine, and became a sensation. There was even a ‘Johnny Turbo’ cartoon, and surveys have rated Johnny Turbo as the #2 most-recognized video game character, just behind Namco’s Pac-Man. That single game, more than anything else, may have cemented NEC/Hudson (the two would not merge until the 1990s) as a leader in the American video game market.” – UpLevel!: A History of Video Games, 2001

“The Osborne Wildebeest is built for the serious gamer. It’s got the fastest Intel processors and the most RAM, and has easy-to-access slots to install add-on chips. And with the Microsoft XENIX operating system and Premiere, it’s also a machine for the whole family.” – Osborne advertisement, 1988.

“ASCII Corporation and the Microcomputer division of Fujitsu Limited announced today plans for a new computer standard called AFM… The new standard will utilize the system microarchitecture used by Fujitsu’s business-class FM/PC50 [based on 65c816], but will run a new operating system designed in-house by Fujitsu called CASTLE…” – Tokyo Computer Magazine [translation], Dec 1988

“As a response to ASCII’s end of support for MSX, Panasonic and other MSX vendors created the MSXr3 standard instead, which was arguably less advanced, but could run all the old MSX software, including games.” – Japanese Gaming Computers of the 1990s, Master Magazine, Jun 2006

“With the new CA series, Apple has entirely departed from the form-factor of the original Macintosh, and that’s a good thing… System Software 4 has a number of improvements that are sure to delight the Mac fanatic... But the most shocking thing is the price of the ‘base model’ Macintosh CA-d: Apple has returned to the affordable segment of the market, and Lorraine had better look out.” – Computer World Magazine, Jan 1990

“The Amiga Advanced Architecture was the last major chipset revision for the classic Amiga… the first use was on the V-series Amigas, released in the US in of February 1990, was plagued by issues relating to the fact that it had been originally scheduled for release a year later, and the fact that more and more of Lorraine’s funds had to be devoted to the Apple lawsuit. The still fairly-new Enhanced Architecture XL machines, kept on the market, ended up outselling it by a substantial amounts… the XV-series machines, released a year later, are the better bet for users looking for AA machines, but some consider the V-series more collectible due to their relative rarity.” – “Amiga Buyer’s Guide”, amigasite.org

XENIX’s Essentially Not unIX” – Popular internet joke in the early 90’s

“WEST CHESTER, PA - Commodore International, Inc., along with Texas Instruments Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. filed suit against Intel Corporation today… The companies allege that Intel is failing to follow agreements signed between Commodore Semiconductor Group and Western Design Center, purchased by Intel, regarding successors to the 6502 design, specifically the recently announced i3816 processor… Commodore has further protested that Intel be barred from sale of all processors based on the 6502, which was developed by MOS Technology, a Commodore subsidiary… Intel has claimed that the i3816 ‘substantially differs’ from previous models...” – “New processors spur lawsuit”, The New York Times, Jun. 28, 1990

“We face several threats to our business. First, we are engaged in an ongoing lawsuit with Apple Computer, Inc.over the interface of the Workbench Operating System. Failure in this lawsuit could be extremely detrimental to our business and could lead injunctions against sale of future machines running Workbench, which encompasses substantially all of our hardware business…” – Excerpt from Lorraine Corporation’s IPO filing, 1990

“Look at Double Devil World: You’ve never seen this many enemies on one screen- you’ve never seen these kinds of graphics- You’ve never seen action this high-speed- All this is made possible only with the Nintendo Advance Computer. You can’t find all this power anywhere else- You’ve gotta have it- Now you’re playing with power- advanced power.” – Nintendo advertisement, 1991

“West Chester, PA-based Commodore International, along with Texas Instruments and Advanced Micro Devices, announced today they had settled with Intel Corporation… Commodore and Intel agreed to mutually license all intellectual property regarding the ‘all processors derived from and including the MOS Technology 6502’… AMD and TI formed a separate settlement wherein they agreed to drop the lawsuit in exchange for an undisclosed sum...” – “Commodore settles Intel suit”, The Wall Street Journal, March 4, 1991

“Unless you spend a lot of time at the arcade, you may not have heard of Sega. Though they’re a big name in quarter-eating, they haven’t sold many home games in the US. That should all change, though, now that they’ve announced plans to bring the 16-bit Master System to the US… Since it’s been out in Japan and Europe for years, it’ll be coming with a much larger library than Nintendo’s Advance.” –GameMaster Magazine, August 1991

“Sun Microsystems announced today that it had agreed to acquire a partial stake in Unix System Laboratories, a division of AT&T’s Bell Laboratories which develops the Unix operating system… the move gives Sun, which uses Unix System V as the core of its Solaris operating system, control over the future direction and releases of Unix. However, the most widely distributed Unix remains Microsoft Corp.’s XENIX.” – “Sun invests in AT&T Unit”, San Francisco Chronicle, August 24, 1991

“The Nintendo Advance Computer was hardly a computer at all. Unlike the Famicom, Nintendo did not bother to include a keyboard or BASIC with the console. Advance BASIC was released a whopping two years into the system’s life-time, and still depended on an archaic Data Recorder system. But perhaps that was the point: Nintendo had successfully made it possible to sell consoles in the US again, they didn’t need to pretend to be a computer.” UpLevel!: A History of Video Games, 2001

“People at AT&T, especially in the telecom giant’s legal department, had become convinced that [the University of California’s release of the BSD operating system] violated their copyrights… However, the people at Sun, who had previously used the BSD-based SunOS and were arguably more familiar with the BSD code, had misgivings about the idea… A smaller case against BSDi’s use of the trademarked name ‘UNIX’ was undertaken, however.” – A History of UNIX, 2006

“The Fujitsu AFM-200 is the first computer sold in the United States with the power of the Castle operating system. But it won’t be the last. Don’t get left behind.” – Fujitsu marketing campaign, 1992. [It was incorrect- US sales fell below expectations and future exports were cancelled.]

“When you make a game for the Amiga, people copy your disks and they’re all over the BBS’s. When you make a game for a console, people can’t make copies. It’s that simple.” – Developer speaking with GameMaster magazine

“1993 is shaping up to be a big year for Unix on the desktop. There’s been plenty of coverage of XENIX4. But the most shocking news is what Apple’s come up with: Macintosh System V. From what they’ve shown, it appears to have taken all that Apple ease of use and layered it on top of a layer of server-class Unix… and speaking of the server space, Sun’s partnership with AT&T appears to be paying off…” – Computers Magazine, Feb 1993

“The court… finds all of the Plaintiff’s charges without validity… and rules in favor of the defendant.” – Resolution of Apple Computer Inc. v. Lorraine Corporation
 
I love it! Keep going.

I must say, though, I would have been one of those who had bought an AFM200 for going away to college, especially if it came in a laptop version. :cool:
 
A laptop AFM200 would be pretty neat to have...

This update was meant to go to 1998, but I fell two years short, and there's still more that I wanted to include...

__________

“System V is a mess- anything running it shouldn’t be called a Mac” – attributed to Apple cofounder and Pixar President Steve Jobs, apocryphal

“The old-school UNIX vendors didn’t realize it yet, but a new era was dawning, and the name of that era was BSD. Not only BSDi’s proprietary BSD/816, but also 'free' projects like NET_BSD, CoreBSD, and the big name, GNU. While the GNU project maintained that it was still working on the Alix microkernel, distributions that combined the GNU utilities and the BSD kernel began to spread…” – A History of UNIX, 2006

“WEST CHESTER, PA. – Commodore International announced today that they would discontinue all of the remaining Commodore 64 line of products. The Commodore 64 was released in 1983, and was a major hit, however, in recent years sales have faltered in favor of Commodore’s Atari-compatible line…” – New York Times, June 5, 1993

“The Sega Atari Master PC was the last computer from IBM to use the storied Atari name… a collaboration with Sega, it featured the full hardware of the 16-bit Master System along with a full Atari PC.” – retrobox.net

“People say a lot of things about Premiere, but it’s far easier to code in than X. Microsoft is leading in developer tools... you can say a lot about the command line, but can you teach a secretary to use a command line? Trust me, I’ve tried…”
“Try running your Premiere so-called-software on anything but X.E.N.ix and see what happens. X runs on everything from the bastard child of System III to modern Unixen like Solaris… If you can’t code for X you’re not a real programmer anyway.”
“You can say what you want… but XENIX is the fastest-growing operating system in the enterprise. Let’s say a business needs a Unix workstation- are they going to buy a $50,000 box from Sun to get Solaris, or spend a fraction of that on a XENIX box built on commodity x816 hardware?”
“Let’s get one thing straight. x816 and the Atari spec was designed for a video game console. The fact that IBM made the mistake of shoe-horning it into a PC box doesn’t change that. If you want to play, use a machine designed for play. If you want to work, use a machine designed for work, even the fools using Amigas realize that… Just ask Digital. They’re one of the biggest x816 makers out there, and yet they’re releasing the Alpha machines for real work. They’re sure as hell not x816. And they’re sure as hell not running X.E.N.ix.” - Excerpts from a Usenet conversation, 1994

“You’ve asked us to make buying a Macintosh easier, and we’ve listened. Now, all you have to do is remember three names: Claris, Performis, and Nexis. Which Mac is for you?” – Macintosh advertisement, 1994

“The 65L816 was the first of the L series of low-power processors from Texas Instruments… work had begun beforehand, but became especially important in the aftermath of Commodore v. Intel, where TI lost its agreement to ‘second source’ Intel’s 32-bit processors. Unlike AMD, which would eventually leave the market for x816 chips entirely to focus on its graphics business, TI focused its efforts on outdoing Intel in a key area, power consumption… the relatively limited instruction set of the 6502 line meant it was a prime candidate for low-power systems, but this had not been a major priority in the past… an early use of the 65L816 was by Palmtop Computing.” – Introduction to the TI L-Series of Processors, 1999

“The IronEngine (FX-PC in Japan; the name was changed due to fears of confusion with Apple’s Macintosh FX line), successor to the popular TurboEngine (PC-Engine in Japan), was NEC’s 32-bit system. (having acquired a majority of shares in Hudson Soft, their partner in the venture) At the time of the system’s development, in the west games like side-scrollers like Johnny Turbo 3 and shooters, while in Japan FMV-heavy RPGs like Square’s Crystal Fantasy and the beginnings of the ‘bishojo’ genre of visual novels like Tokimeki Koukou were becoming popular… the IronEngine would not achieve the same market share that the TurboEngine had held.” – NECtendega: The Golden Age of Video Games, 2010

“WHAT IS QUADRO?” – Intel teaser, 1994

“Nintendo revealed at its SpaceWorld this year that the 32-bit Nintendo Ultra, its next-generation console, will do a simultaneous US and Japan launch in December… The TurboEngine has had a remarkable run, and Nintendo has got to be annoyed that the technically superior Advance Computer hasn’t captured the heart of the market …” – GameMaster Magazine, Oct 1994

“Apple Computer has quietly discontinued its Performis line of computers, merging it with its more affordable Claris banner. The move comes as the company announced it had posted a loss for calendar year 1994, so we can expect it’s primarily a cost-saving move…” – Mac Maniac Magazine, Feb 1995

“The Quadro Architecture, internally referred to as i4816, has many important backend changes even compared to i3816. This allows for dramatic increases in clock speed, but clock speed doesn’t tell the whole story here either. We’ve driven down deep to look at what really makes this machine tick…” – “Introducing Quadro”, Intermag (magazine), Apr 1995

“Presenting the Next Generation of Amiga. Presenting the Lorraine Amie… The Amie features a Motorola 98000 RISC processor, the first computer in the world to use this advanced processor… It features all the power you’d expect from a Lorraine… with the newest version of Workbench, built with all the usability of past versions.” – Lorraine advertisement, 1995

“Digital’s Osborne Supreme. The lightest portable computer on the market with Intel’s newest Quadro™ Processor, it packs a lot of punch in a small package.” – Digital advertisement, 1995

“Palmtop is hoping to define a whole new class of devices, so it’s really hard to give the Palmtop 2 an exact category. Is it a computer? Perhaps, but it’s not a very powerful one. You’re not going to want to run Microsoft XENIX on it... The most important question, however: Is the Palmtop 2 the future? It may very well be… Why is it the Palmtop 2? Palmtop Computing tells us that the Palmtop 1 was an internal prototype deemed not ready for release…” TIME Magazine’s review of the Palmtop 2, Oct 3, 1995

“Lorraine had become one of Motorola’s largest customers for its chip division, and therefore, when they came to Motorola looking to shift away from the aging 68k line, it got special attention… the result, the 98000, was an upgraded variant of Motorola’s slow-selling 78120 RISC chip. Not only did it launch as a Lorraine exclusive, it was just different enough to be incompatible with the 78k. The differences were necessary to simplify the job of running Amiga software on the new machine, but alienated some of Motorola’s other customers, especially when the company announced it would cease efforts on the 78k series…” – The Amie Series I, amigasite.org

“While 1995’s System 6 would resolve many of the issues people had with System V, the damage was done, and Apple was beginning to fall apart by 1996. The company’s ‘simplified’ system had become a mess, and killing Performa didn’t really help when all its models were simply added to Claris... To make matters worse, Motorola development on the 68k was slowing. Apple had been working with Hewlett-Packard since 1993 to use the 64-bit Precision Architecture for an entirely new line of Macs, but this was increasingly delayed… Nevertheless, Apple CEO John Sculley pushed ahead, pausing development on 68060-based machines to focus on the ‘Macintosh Precision’ line.” - Insanely Great: The Apple Macintosh and its Legacy, 2008

“Sculley ousted by Apple board”
“Lorraine predicts loss on 1995; blames expense of Amie launch” – Headlines from the Wall Street Journal, Dec 1995

“In December of 1995, NEC released two pieces of hardware that, at the time, were overlooked by the market due to the release of Nintendo’s Ultra… the IronCard could be attached to nearly any CAT-compliant computer, and allow it to play IronEngine games… The TurboCard played a similar role to the IronCard for the older TurboEngine, but unlike the IronCard or the older Sega Atari it off-loaded much of the work to the system’s processor.” – TurboIron.com: The Classic NEC fan’s #1 resource!

“…Ultra Devil World is the foremost launch title of the Ultra, and is the heir to a long line of excellent titles, from the Famicom’s Super Devil World series, to the Advance Computer’s Double Devil World, and now it enters the third dimension. Famed Nintendo developer Shigeru Miyamoto has reportedly pulled out all the stops… but it’s a rare miss.” – “Nintendo launches Ultra”, New York Times, December 15, 1995

“Xenix 1996 is the biggest step forward for Microsoft in a long time. Indeed, arguably Microsoft may have now surpassed Workbench and Macintosh System 6 in terms of user-friendliness… However, diehard Unix enthusiasts may be less than thrilled with the removal of the instant command-line. With the new Xenix Executive, Microsoft has sent a strong message to developers: don’t rely on the command-line for your programs. That’s a significant break with Unix philosophy, but for new users it’s a huge plus...” – Computers Magazine, Mar 1996

“The difference between Apple Computer and the Titanic is that the Titanic had a band” – attributed to Michael Dell

“The Sega-64 is the most advanced of the new generation of consoles. Sega has partnered with Sony to provide more advanced graphics and uses a 64-bit processor, though exact details can be debated the performance can’t. 3D is far more fluid on the 64 than Nintendo’s Ultra, and it’s hardly worth mentioning the IronEngine here- it’s clear NEC thinks that 3D is little more than a gimmick.” – GameMaster Magazine, Mar 1996

“Shigeru Miyamoto out at Nintendo; Ultra Devil World blamed” – Tokyo Times, Jun 2, 1996

“Apple’s released an entirely new line of computers, based on Motorola’s 68060 processor. These replace the old Nexis machines, but are simply called the ‘Macintosh’ followed by a numeric designation... Yes, we thought the 68060 machines were dead too, but despite Lorraine’s claims that the architecture is fundamentally outdated, the 68060 holds up surprisingly well against the 98k and all but the highest-end Quadro processors... “– Mac Maniac Magazine, Jun 1996

“Microsoft and a group of hardware partners, including Turbo Computer and Commodore, have announced the Palm PC standard of hardware, which will run the Microsoft-developed CENIX operating system… unlike Microsoft’s popular desktop operating system XENIX, CENIX is not based on Unix, but is a system ‘designed entirely for the mobile environment’.” – TIME Magazine, Oct 1996
 
This is so fun! :)

BTW, Tokimeki KouKou (Tokou for short) is a great game. My favorite character is the shy girl who turns out to be an alien. Oh.. sorry for the spoilers.
 
So this means that Alpha eventurally dies an ignonimous death, MIPS is confined to microcontrollers, and SPARC to Sun servers and workstations just like OTL, but TTL's TI's OMAP is based on the MOS/Intel architecture making it effectively an Atom/Tegra mashup? Interesting times indeed.

Frankly, though, I'm surprised that Sega, Hitachi, Sharp, NEC/Hudson, Panosonic, possibly Fujitsu, and some disgruntled or startup American companies (Like Be or NeXT, I notice that Scully stayed in charge of Apple until 1995) haven't decided to create a new compatibility standard to fight both Microsoft and Apple/Lorraine using something like the OTL's BeOS microkernel and either MIPS or Hitachi SuperH for the CPU. (Probably the latter, as its a direct descendant of the Motorola 6800 series through the 6809, Hitachi 6309, and H series of RISC microcontrollers). With the MSX3 standard now an utter boat anchor, this could be one last throw of the dice to get back in the game!
 
So this means that Alpha eventurally dies an ignonimous death, MIPS is confined to microcontrollers, and SPARC to Sun servers and workstations just like OTL, but TTL's TI's OMAP is based on the MOS/Intel architecture making it effectively an Atom/Tegra mashup? Interesting times indeed.
Alpha's probably better off for now, since DEC is doing better. Of course, that only solves the direct cause of death, not the industry trends...

MIPS is still used in the video game consoles as well... at one point I had a table showing the technical details, but I had formatting issues so I decided to go without.
Frankly, though, I'm surprised that Sega, Hitachi, Sharp, NEC/Hudson, Panosonic, possibly Fujitsu, and some disgruntled or startup American companies (Like Be or NeXT, I notice that Scully stayed in charge of Apple until 1995) haven't decided to create a new compatibility standard to fight both Microsoft and Apple/Lorraine using something like the OTL's BeOS microkernel and either MIPS or Hitachi SuperH for the CPU. (Probably the latter, as its a direct descendant of the Motorola 6800 series through the 6809, Hitachi 6309, and H series of RISC microcontrollers). With the MSX3 standard now an utter boat anchor, this could be one last throw of the dice to get back in the game!
Hm, I was thinking that the Japanese manufacturers would be more likely to offer enhanced Intel-compatible machines (like the FM-Towns eventually became in OTL) rather than trying to push a new standard...
 
Some missing links

I would have thought the Sharp X6800 could play a more important roll considering it used a similar 68k chipset to Atari and a Unix based OS. There is also an even greater pressing question, where is Sinclair Research (made the ZX Spectrum) and Psion (developed EPOC whose successor is Symbian) go? Acorn decided to become a PC clone earlier so it seems you have done away with the UK's contribution to personal computer advancement.:(

So without CBM acquiring the whole contract with HP and PA-RISC powered 64bit Hombre chipset project get butterflied away from the TL. Speaking of PA-RISC where is Hewlett Packard and Compaq among others who dabbled in PC clones in this entire TL? Does AT&T still design the CRISP Hobbit CPU?

Also, a Commodore TL without a single mention of its founder Jack Tramiel!?:eek: I would also like to interject that it would have been cool to see more development of something along the lines of the Atari STPad considering the early death of its console business due to IBM's acquisition would do away with the Jaguar hogging R&D, mindshare and investment resources.

And I guess Sony gets cold feet when it comes to going into the console market which does away with its collaborative platform research with IBM and eventually Toshiba. I wonder if that means they will continue with their plans on making an expansion for Nintendo to play CD games? Perhaps maybe in this topsy terbie we'll see Trip Hawkins license a more successful 3DO design.:p

Edit: Sorry, I missed the footnote on Acorn computers. I would think they could have done more since they can tap into a lot of talent at Cambridge University and (unless they didn't win the BBC contract) receive much plenty of public funding to pursue great endeavors, before the British PC market collapses (if it does like OTL). I am still wondering how you will make this affect the mobile market.
 
Last edited:
Top