We all know that before the Normans, another foreigner landed on English shores and nearly stole the crown- Harold Hadrada of Norway. Unfortunately, in landing first, he had to deal with the English at their best, and was unable to take much beyond york.
But what if his and William's fortunes were reversed in 1066, and the Kingdom of Norway and the Kingdom of England were ruled by one and the same man? Would the union last, or would it be a mere footnote in an anglo-saxon british history? Would Scotland fall to the Ango-Norwegian Kingdoms, thus turning the North Sea into a Norwegian Lake?
And what of the Scandinavian homelands? With norway ruling england i doubt they'd have much to gain in the Kalmar Union, if they hadn't already conquered the others. Or would it instead be they who dominate the union of supposed equals?
And what of the great beast that was the British Empire? could Norway-England ever hope to match otl's Britannia?
But what if his and William's fortunes were reversed in 1066, and the Kingdom of Norway and the Kingdom of England were ruled by one and the same man? Would the union last, or would it be a mere footnote in an anglo-saxon british history? Would Scotland fall to the Ango-Norwegian Kingdoms, thus turning the North Sea into a Norwegian Lake?
And what of the Scandinavian homelands? With norway ruling england i doubt they'd have much to gain in the Kalmar Union, if they hadn't already conquered the others. Or would it instead be they who dominate the union of supposed equals?
And what of the great beast that was the British Empire? could Norway-England ever hope to match otl's Britannia?