with italy still trying to kill the ottomans, have the italians tried anything with austria hungary, has italy tried stocking nationalism in the land they consider theres? Why does italy not join russia in the war?
Italy isn't really trying to kill the Ottoman Empire. The only country with a grudge match level of hate is Greece, and they can't really afford it. The Italians are opportunistic territory-grabbers with no particular investment in the Ottoman Empire one way or the other.
Theirs is a world where 1918 hasn't happened, so their view is that of pre-WWI geopolitics. They want to rule colonies, and the only viable place they can get them is the Ottoman periphery and Africa. Hence Libya (successful), Ethiopia (failed) and Albania (failed). Italy stands broadly on the anti-Ottoman side because they hope to benefit from a possible future dismembering of the Empire, but that is because they are allied to France, not because they actually have that as a policy goal.
Militarily, the Italians actually would stand a chance at contesting serious amounts of territory. In an alliance with Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia, and possibly Romania, they might stand a chance of finishing the Ottomans. It isn't going to happen because on about day 10 of that war, a European conflictr would start. Attacking the Ottomans would get the British to intervene, that will draw the French in (they cannot afford to lose Italy or the ability to contest the Mediterranean) which would trigger the Anglo-German alliance at which point the possible neutrality of Austria-Hungary will not do anything much to relieve the continentwide fuckedness that ensues. That is why.
How has The austro hungarian navy developed?
Much like the German one, only more so. They retain and modernise their old battlefleet, but do not meaningfully enter into the dreadnought races. Instead, they focus on a force of smaller craft and become very, very good at it. AH cruisers, torpedo boats, submarines, minelayers, destroyer flotillas and naval air would, in the event of a war against Italy, turn the Adriatic into a kill zone for anything that floats and operate in the central Med against Italian and other enemy (read: French) shipping.
In regards to Poland, where are fracture lines in society? Like are the factory owners god fearing catholics or are they secular who want a modern state? which parts of society lean socialist? Political leaning of the military?
The military is - uncomfortably centrist. There are extreme conservatives in the ranks, but the nature of their force structuire means they have to embrace cooperation with other ethnic elements, and there are a shitload of legacy Party Combat Wing officers. This changes gradually as the army turns more royalist, reaching its peak in the 1950s and 1960s.
Most businesspeople are either conservative (that is Catholic and royalist) or liberal (that is nationalists). Many of their labour force are organised in the Socialist party. The conservatives will win greater influence over time, but they never rule the country outright.
The strongest support for a reactionary Ständestaat comes from petit bourgeois and smallholding farmers, including those settled postwar in the Eastern territories. Most people in cities, even the most conservative, imagine something more modern, more efficient, more - fascist. They don't have the name for it, but they have the dream. Most conservative Jews, to the extent they engage in national politics (many Chasidic communities do not) lean that way. But far more Jews are liberal or Socialist.
Is there any friction between ruthenia and poland both being agriculture exports? Like whats happening now is ukranian grain undercutting poland?
The Poles will be unhappy, but what can you do? A large part of the breadbasket of Ukraine is still Russian ITTL, so they are more likely to gripe about Russian grain undercutting them. Warsaw certainly tries to push around the Ruthenian rump state - they see themselves as the senior power in every regard - and gets away with it sometimes. It's a cause of friction between Berlin and Vienna. But it's never bad enough to call the alliance into question. Even when Berlin forgets about the bear, Warsaw never does.
Last where does norway stand in the european political aligning?
Norway is allied to Britain. It's not a high-level issue, they do not feel threatened or have overseas interests they trust the British to defend the way Portugal does, but it is the most rational stance and Britain is willing to incur a meaningful cost in order to secure its northeastern flank. Imagine if they were allied to France - Paris would love it, but the Norwegians know it's not worth the economic cost or political risk. In a war, the Swedish would cut the country in half and roll up resistance. This way, it's profitable neutrality.
question does Thuringia ever get reformed or does it remain the weird patchwork of small duchies? If so what happens to its rulers?
No way will the Reich touch ANY of the sacred arrangement The Bismarck (PBUH) made. Thuringia remains organised into tiny principalities, and as time passes, it matters less and less. Think of how the EU is capable of integrating places like Liechtenstein, Andorra, or Monaco. They are absolutely sovereign states except everyone knows that functionally, they are not. One deals. At the end of it all, you get a lot of photogenic residences and cutesy photo-op guards units, a certain quaint pomposity of their representatives in the Reichsrat, but none of it matters beyond a degree of excess friction the machinery can tolerate.