How many PODs do you want?Like the title says, when do you think the earliest plausible manned moon landing would be?
No, Apollo 8 was the first circum lunar mission and only had a mock up lander to simulate the mass, Apollo 10 could theoretically land and there was some fear that the crew might go against its orders and land so they only filled the ascent modules tanks to half.Wasn't Apollo 8 capable of landing on the Moon, but wasn't allowed to because that wasn't what its mission.
No, Apollo 8 was the first circum lunar mission and only had a mock up lander to simulate the mass, Apollo 10 could theoretically land and there was some fear that the crew might go against its orders and land so they only filled the ascent modules tanks to half.
I dont think Apollo 8 could, Apollo 11 though could happen earlier, but they still need missions like Apollo 8, 9 and 10 to work out the kinks and confirm everything works. For example the lander on Apollo 10 was still overweight, that's why the tanks were half full. Only Apollo 11 gota lander which could take off properly.Ah, ok. I knew it was one of the earlier rockets.
However, Apollo 8 could have done it, if it was outfitted with a proper lander. If the Apollo project was started earlier, then a landing could have taken place at anytime during the 1960s.
Early 1960s. Assuming vents up to 1940 go more-or-less as OTL.Like the title says, when do you think the earliest plausible manned moon landing would be?
Came here to post this, and saw I was Ninja'd
Mid 70s or later. OTL'S Apollo wasn't very plausible.
That's the difference between reality and fiction--reality doesn't need to make sense. That said, I think that OTL's Apollo was not all that implausible. Expensive, yes, but not implausible.