McPherson
Banned
Got the sources on that? I'd love to read up on it.
US Government Printing Office. Ask for declassified Fleet Problems post exercise analysis for 1927.
Got the sources on that? I'd love to read up on it.
About 20 years ago I read an article in Warship magazine which took the position that the Counties were the most appropriately armored Treaty cruisers. In summary Treaty cruisers never stood in a firing line and blasted each other at 20k yards. They got hit by bombs, torpedoes and short range fire that no cruiser scale protection had a chance of stopping. The Counties (at least initially) went for stout build, duplication, and magazine protection. It is an argument to be had, but it got me thinking just how tin clad the tin clads really were.
In the 30s as engine tech improved a lot of the weight savings on new ships got put into protection that arguably was never used. Imagine if that didn't happen? It is not even using that much hindsight. It is how cruisers fought in WWI, which in turn informed the County's armor scheme.
Revised the designs. Any comments?
Yes, they're the legacy fleet
Thank you for the suggestions.Personally i would remove the tertiary guns on the cruisers and see if you can't get rid of the low freeboard, since that will negativly effect it's seakeeping. And is only acceptable in the Med or the Baltic.
The Battleships are good if expensive, but i prefer ditching low calibre tertiaries for something else, a couple of submerged torpedo tubes might not be the most effective, but is a very nasty surprise on the rare occasion that it works. i like the 3" deck armour, will keep them relevant with the upgrades to FC longer and even when guns start being more focused on horizontal penetration.
The light cruisers not having BE/DE and in one case not any deck armour is going to hurt. And with the PC armour scheme you benefit a lot from having deck armour on these early cruisers.
For a MS, the speed is not needed (or well, i accept their inevitable demise if they fight anything other than an early destroyer), I like mine with 2x1 3" guns and 1" deck, belt, turret. that way they can defeat early 2-3" armed destroyers in a gunfight since those weapons don't penetrate armour.
The destroyers looks interesting, more of a destroyer hunter than a torpedo boats which will be useful to have escorting your battleline. You may want to consider a torpedo focused destroyer in the future if you expect to fight the RN or the USN with their larger budgets and battlelines.
I think you have the years wrong, instead of 1876 when she was sunk, wouldn't it be 1886, if she served for 15 years?CSS Virginia
Laid down: 1871
Location: Virginia Fleet Shipbuilders
Type: Ocean Going Monitor
Specs:
Length: 320 feet long
Beam: 62 feet
Draft: 20 feet
Speed: 14 knots (as of launch)
Complement: 214
Displacement: 7,200 tons
Armament:
4 X 11 inch guns
4 X 2 inch guns
4 X Gatling guns
Armor:
Amidships: 11 inches
Barbettes: 10 inches
Turrets: 8 inches
Deck: 1 inch gun
History:
This was the first ship launched for the Confederate ship after the war of Southern Independence and not under a state flag. Praised at the time for its power and speed, was the flagship between for the Confederate Navy for the next 15 years. Despite this, the naval admirals of the infantile state kept the ship well out of harms way whenever possible due to concerns over its plating. However the ship remained a symbol of Confederate strength compared to the smaller but more numerous US ships.
After a 1875 refit, the ship was placed at the head of a taskforce to bombard Rio De Janerio to force Brazil to pay its loans. Disaster would strike the taskforce as a storm slowed the fleet giving Brazil much needed warning.
On the morning of May 16th, 1876 the fortress guarding the harbor caught sight of the taskforce of 14 vessels and aiming at the elderly vessel and fired. The first twelve salvos saw no strike as the harbor defense fleet and invaders began to fight. However the 13th salvo struck home. As the ships armor had not been changed for 15 years the inevitable happened. The fortresses 12 inch cannons ripped through the deck armor and struck the magazine. The ship sank instantly taking all but 5 men with it. The losses included Admiral Ingraham and her captain.
The taskforce fled having inflicted minor damage to the Brazilian fleet fearing the fortresses cannons. Two weeks later as the taskforce was returning, news arrived that a US taskforce had succeeded.
The news was a shock to the nation that realized it's focus for state built vessels built with non standard parts left little in the jar for the Confederate navy to perform it's duties. Thus the nation took an uncharacteristic course of action and ordered that all state owned naval ships, excluding those on rivers, and their budgets were to be sent to the Confederate Navy.
This process took time as many feared the results of giving the nation power over the states. However the US buildup and scrappage of 1860s vessels finally gave credence.
In 1883, the Confederate Navy ordered a Coastal defense battleship from Barrow in Furness named Southern Pride. With that, the Confederate Navy rose again.
My bad.I think you have the years wrong, instead of 1876 when she was sunk, wouldn't it be 1886, if she served for 15 years?
Not alternate warships but a good discussion none the less.
And lets be honest here, both had their merits. AFD and normal carriers were creatures of their environments and settings and did well enough in them.
No Tillman battleship ever had triple superfiring guns like in the one above. The one with 15 5x3 18" guns had the #3 Turret (the Z, as it were) aft of the superstructure firing forward on the same deck as the X, not superfiring over the Y.
History:
This was the first ship launched for the Confederate ship after the war of Southern Independence and not under a state flag. Praised at the time for its power and speed, was the flagship between for the Confederate Navy for the next 15 years. Despite this, the naval admirals of the infantile state kept the ship well out of harms way whenever possible due to concerns over its plating. However the ship remained a symbol of Confederate strength compared to the smaller but more numerous US ships.
After a 1885 refit, the ship was placed at the head of a taskforce to bombard Rio De Janerio to force Brazil to pay its loans. Disaster would strike the taskforce as a storm slowed the fleet giving Brazil much needed warning.
On the morning of May 16th, 1886 the fortress guarding the harbor caught sight of the taskforce of 14 vessels and aiming at the elderly vessel and fired. The first twelve salvos saw no strike as the harbor defense fleet and invaders began to fight. However the 13th salvo struck home. As the ships armor had not been changed for 15 years the inevitable happened. The fortresses 12 inch cannons ripped through the deck armor and struck the magazine. The ship sank instantly taking all but 5 men with it. The losses included Admiral Ingraham and her captain.
The ships were built OTL, however the Confederate Navy risked it as the ships were mutinying at the time. however they didn't count on the guns of the forts being accurate enough.1886? The Brazilians have available the brand new Riachuelo and Aquidaba battleships, that OTL were the most powerful battleships in the western hemisphere (4x9.2in BL guns, 11in steel armour), the older (built 1874) Javary and Solimoes (3,543t 4x10in ML guns, 12in iron armour), 3 lesser central battery ships (Sete De Setembro built 1874, Cabral and Colombo built 1866), 7 torpedo boats and a number of cruisers.
Sounds to me as if the CSN is going into a suicide run here...
Wanted to see what you all thought of another one of my springsharp attempts! Tips and advice welcome!
What timeline is this from?