12:08 - Redux

Devvy

Donor
Good to see an update though I do hope an update focusing all on Pullman which speaking of which...
TTL, will we see a Blue Pullman paint job on one of the Pullman trains as seen above? :)

Remaining chapters I'm definitely planning on doing:
- Intercity ("Classic")
- Intercity Pullman
- Railfreight
- "Final Thoughts" versus OTL.
 
Well Transpennine are in a good position to benefit from the 'Northern Power House' if its happens ITTL or the invertible merger of all those cities across the belt there...

Has all 'slam-door' stock gone in the area by 2020?

Any changes to York's situation as far as heritage lines go?

Is the Derwent Valley Railway longer ITTL?
 

Devvy

Donor
Well Transpennine are in a good position to benefit from the 'Northern Power House' if its happens ITTL or the invertible merger of all those cities across the belt there...

Has all 'slam-door' stock gone in the area by 2020?

Any changes to York's situation as far as heritage lines go?

Is the Derwent Valley Railway longer ITTL?

The NPH proposal contained suggestions to improve transport in OTL; I guess those proposals won't be there in this TL, as cross-Pennine transport is already much better than OTL.

I think there will still be some limited slam door EMU stock in use in the north-west, in a similar fashion to Pacers are still around in OTL; predominately those which were introduced with early electrification.

For York itself; probably little change. I think the rail museum is likely still there, and there's the same scope for the Derwent to be in the same place. York itself is just as much as interchange as before; it's lost Anglo-Scottish expresses (to Pullman which bypasses York), but retained London expresses from the North-East as well as more connections to East Yorkshire (OTL connections plus routes to Hull and Whitby).
 

Devvy

Donor
Was the Great Central retained? I have distant memories of a post on that. Just if there would be any implications for HS2 for that.
Yes (and no worries; the first post of this TL was over 2 years ago!! ).

The main GCML flows of coal dropped at the same time as APT development started. This was one of the major butterflies; get round the limitations of the APT by concentrating APT services mostly on the GCML (which then became known as "Pullman" in this TL). The bottom of the GCML near Aylesbury was connected to the WCML near Tring, to allow APT services out of Euston to run at much higher speeds using a dedicated line with newer signalling on it. London to Nottingham, Sheffield and Manchester were sure fire winners, and spurred the onwards development of Pullman in this TL (firstly to Leeds, and later to Newcastle, Edinburgh and Glasgow).

This TL Pullman (still using the GCML spine) doesn't run at full "high speed" - my estimates are in the 220-250km/h depending on the exact area, but it's faster than OTL, and predictably means there is no economic case for a new high speed line (such as OTL HS2); I'll save the rest of the analysis for the Pullman chapter soon! :)
 
Yes (and no worries; the first post of this TL was over 2 years ago!! ).

The main GCML flows of coal dropped at the same time as APT development started. This was one of the major butterflies; get round the limitations of the APT by concentrating APT services mostly on the GCML (which then became known as "Pullman" in this TL). The bottom of the GCML near Aylesbury was connected to the WCML near Tring, to allow APT services out of Euston to run at much higher speeds using a dedicated line with newer signalling on it. London to Nottingham, Sheffield and Manchester were sure fire winners, and spurred the onwards development of Pullman in this TL (firstly to Leeds, and later to Newcastle, Edinburgh and Glasgow).

This TL Pullman (still using the GCML spine) doesn't run at full "high speed" - my estimates are in the 220-250km/h depending on the exact area, but it's faster than OTL, and predictably means there is no economic case for a new high speed line (such as OTL HS2); I'll save the rest of the analysis for the Pullman chapter soon! :)
Makes you wonder if the GCR had survived just a few years more in which it would've helped APT in many ways IOTL, plus with a Channel Tunnel connection, then Edward Watkins, the man behind the GCR, would have ultimately had his dream realised of his mainline connecting with France via the tunnel which he had always wanted but got stopped due to the security concerns then.

And yes, while there is no case for another HST mainline, that doesn't mean that we'd see the controversial big budget project ITTL which here might be the rail tunnel to Ireland which to me is on the thing that might see a further extension of Pullman if it is the flagship of the railways here.
 
Ooooh, so APT worked in this TL? Interesting, what became of the Blue Pullman? Only I have seen it mooted as an earlier HST, ditching the passenger/motorcar hybrid for a straight separate unit.
 
Makes you wonder if the GCR had survived just a few years more in which it would've helped APT in many ways IOTL, plus with a Channel Tunnel connection, then Edward Watkins, the man behind the GCR, would have ultimately had his dream realised of his mainline connecting with France via the tunnel which he had always wanted but got stopped due to the security concerns then.

And yes, while there is no case for another HST mainline, that doesn't mean that we'd see the controversial big budget project ITTL which here might be the rail tunnel to Ireland which to me is on the thing that might see a further extension of Pullman if it is the flagship of the railways here.

What about a channel bridge? Just for the alt-world factor.
 
What about a channel bridge? Just for the alt-world factor.
Scotland gets the road bridge to Northern Ireland, the rail tunnel (IIRC from designers) would be from Liverpool to Belfast via the Isle of Man which would connect them as part of the project kill two birds with one stone. Both might kill the ferry service though...
 

Devvy

Donor
Makes you wonder if the GCR had survived just a few years more in which it would've helped APT in many ways IOTL, plus with a Channel Tunnel connection, then Edward Watkins, the man behind the GCR, would have ultimately had his dream realised of his mainline connecting with France via the tunnel which he had always wanted but got stopped due to the security concerns then.

And yes, while there is no case for another HST mainline, that doesn't mean that we'd see the controversial big budget project ITTL which here might be the rail tunnel to Ireland which to me is on the thing that might see a further extension of Pullman if it is the flagship of the railways here.

Leaving the B-word aside, which leaves open and undefined whether Cameron had a longer stint as PM, I agree you'd see some kind of "think big" infrastructure projects. I've been gently researching the Irish Sea crossing over the last few weeks, and will probably feature it somewhere, although (spoiler alert) it definitely won't be in existence yet! ;)

Ooooh, so APT worked in this TL? Interesting, what became of the Blue Pullman? Only I have seen it mooted as an earlier HST, ditching the passenger/motorcar hybrid for a straight separate unit.

I didn't write about the Blue Pullman granted, and skipped over it. It still ran; it was an important part of BR figuring out fixed set trains (or at least semi-fixed) are much more efficient than open rakes of coaches, whilst they also demonstrated the economic possibilities of faster trains. The Blue Pullman name, indicated a fast train service, morphed in to the "Pullman" name used for the Intercity "higher speed" network.

What about a channel bridge? Just for the alt-world factor.

This is something else that the powers that be in this TL will be considering; the Channel Tunnel will be discussed in the Pullman chapter, but safe to say, it's a busy tunnel.

Scotland gets the road bridge to Northern Ireland, the rail tunnel (IIRC from designers) would be from Liverpool to Belfast via the Isle of Man which would connect them as part of the project kill two birds with one stone. Both might kill the ferry service though...

As per above! :)
 
2020-Finale-6-Intercity

Devvy

Donor
2020 Roundup: Intercity (Classic)

ic-poster2.jpg

Customer relations in full effect.

Intercity is the primary passenger sector for longer distance travel; it covers most long distance "medium speed" operations (as opposed to "high speed" Pullman operations - which are a sub-sector of Intercity). Born in the 1950s and 1960s as a train service name, it was later adopted by British Rail as a brand for it's longer distance services along the then newly electrified West Coast Route. The brand, referring to the network of long distance services predominately between London, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool and Glasgow was a success, and as other routes were modernised (not always including electrification, but at the very least away from steam), they too became branded as "Intercity" (*1). The fast electric trains, often cruising at around 90mph (*2), provided British Rail with an enviable product; a futuristic and modern train to ride on, which was more cost efficient to operate and soundly beat out the increasing road competition. The 1980s saw the birth of "Intercity Pullman" (later abbreviated to just "Pullman", although still an Intercity operation), which introduced high speed operations from London to many northern English cities, with trains often speeding past at around 150mph. Thankfully, the continued investment in electrification continued (*3), with more and more routes converted, and allowing more and more of a "network effect" - where the return on investment for further projects becomes ever greater, as more of the initial route is electrified to start with, and major stations already wired up. Further works by civil engineers in straightening tracks to allow maximum speeds paid dividends with further improved speeds as slow speed limits were removed (*4).

The long distance Intercity network reached it's zenith in the early 1990s, before hitting a double problem. Government intervention, technical limits and internal reorganisations saw a loss of revenue growth. Rather than doing most things in house, Intercity now had to spend time and resources on contracting out many operations - seeing much of it's onboard food catering now bought in pre-made (*5), and operations like cleaning seeing contracted out in the 1990s and 2000s. Some of these returned to inhouse operations for reliability reasons later, but the reorganisation made Intercity stumble somewhat. The technical limits of the widespread 1.5kV DC electric power, with 100-110mph the most realistically achievable prohibited further time savings (*6). Although the technology was old, it was widespread and to be fair had been simple to deploy and simple to harness - not just for traction but for other benefits such as regenerative braking which reduced friction brake maintenance requirements (*7). Internal reorganisations saw some Intercity routes moved to other sectors; Southeastern took the Gatwick Express, and Anglia took over the London to Norwich service, both in the 1990s. The broader economy hit Intercity revenues too in the early 1990s, but by 2000 the economy was soundly growing again, and passengers growing once more at a rate - helped by the growing congestion on the road network.

ic-poster.jpg

Intercity efforts to get weekend passengers to upgrade to first class.

The 2010s saw a host of smaller innovations aimed at improving the customer experience, which all started with the modernisation of Intercity's station lounges, with better seating, food & drink provisions, and easy access to platforms. On the trains, dot matrix displays were standard on newer Voyager trains and fitted above the seats (*8), which allowed the elimination of "paper seat reservations" where staff had to manually place reservations in each seat before the train set off from it's first station. The introduction of a the internet allowed pre-purchase of onboard food with guaranteed service (non pre-purchased food still available subject to demand and timetabling) - this allowed the first class "Great British Breakfast" to improve, with breakfast served for business people rapidly after the train departed their boarding station (*9). Much of this functionality was brought together in 2015 with an "Intercity" smartphone app, allowing the storing of tickets (scanned by QR barcode similar to an airline), food options (tea & coffee were frequently offered as standard in first class), station information, and connecting trains information (*10). Later updates would bring forth quick-purchase functionality in the applications, and also allowing access to the onboard computer via the at-seat Firewire connection, allowing the tracking of train position and up to the minute timetabling information as well as TV channels (*11). The introduction of a "frequent traveller" programme using the app to track ticket purchases allowed a better system of rewarding frequent and high-spending travellers with increased benefits (such as free seat reservations, onboard food, access to lounges and cheap upgrades to first class when seats were available). For the first time, all this meant that Intercity could truly act as a "surface airline", mirroring much of the customer service apparent in the aviation market (*12).

Nowadays, Intercity is split in to five sub-divisions:
  • Pullman (*12A).
  • West Coast; Intercity network centred on Birmingham
  • Great Western; London to West England and South Wales
  • East Coast; Intercity routes from London to the East Midlands, Yorkshire and North-East.
  • Other (*12B).


The Intercity West Coast map

West Coast
The West Coast division is a merger of what was formerly the West Coast Route and CrossCountry Routes, and is by far the largest Intercity division. With Pullman extracting the crack London to Manchester and most London to Liverpool passenger market, the West Coast and CrossCountry operations (which were frequently on the West Coast Route anyway) were merged together. It is now heavily centred on Birmingham New Street, along with much of Intercity's business administration following Government initiatives to move from London, and much of New Street station is dedicated to the Intercity West Coast operations. In former days, many trains terminated here, but the merge with CrossCountry has led to many services developing and now linking across Birmingham, reducing track congestion at the station. A frequent service through Birmingham operates to London (as by far the largest English city without Pullman service), acting as the successor to the original "Inter-City" service, but with those trains now continuing to places beyond Birmingham, and further bolstered with high speed Network South East services operating to Birmingham as well (*13). CrossCountry has also seen a huge upswing during the economic growth in 2000s with regional travel; combined with the West Coast, Birmingham New Street now sees on average at least an Intercity train every 4 minutes. The slow, but continued purchase of Intercity Voyager units; a bi-mode unit able to operate on electric power and diesel power has allowed West Coast to operate now with a largely single fleet type, and eliminate the last vestiges of locomotive hauled trains by 2014. The presence of Britannia Airport on the West Coast network also provides an extra passenger source to and from a range of destinations.

Great Western
The Great Western Route, operating west from London (Paddington), is a somewhat newcomer to electric traction. It's previous "Western Region" regional operators in the days before business sectorisation favoured diesel power (and were labelled the "unwanted family" by other regions for their non-conformist points of view), and that attitude continued for a long time with diesel locomotive hauled coaches operating the route for many decades with, to be fair, a slick and streamlined operation at the termini to turn the train around, although unpowered multiple units back-to-back (to form 10 coach trains) were later utilised. Financial pressures on British Rail meant that the Great Western were forced to mostly continue utilising the trains post electrification, although modernised with newer bi-mode locomotives for several off main-line routes. The exception to this was the premier routes; London to Bristol and London to South Wales, which use modernised and renovated Pullman-1 trains, now marketed as "Clipper" trains (*14). This has aided the Great Western sector in growing profits due to the low costs for the rolling stock, low operational costs, and a route network which has been well utilised. The "M4 Corridor" sees significant congestion on the M4 motorway, whilst also seeing a large London commuter belt from much further distances than usual, which has served to bolster Great Western revenues on the faster rail service. Train congestion at London Paddington is a constant problem now however, with Chiltern Trains also sharing the station, and research is underway on solutions to this problem. Spitballed ideas have included some kind of tunnelled bypass route to take suburban trains (increasing platform availability at Paddington itself), or creating a second set of platforms adjacent to Paddington station - both expensive ideas however.
Cotswold Service: 2 trains per hour, via Swindon; 1 to Gloucester, and 1 to Worcester.
Cambrian Service: 2 trains per hour, via Swindon; 2 to Newport, Cardiff and Swansea.
Avon Service: 2 trains per hour, via Swindon; 2 to Bath and Bristol Temple Meads.
South-West Service: 2 trains per hour, via Newbury; 1 to Plymouth and 1 to Penzance.

Eastern
The Eastern Division covers the remnants of Intercity's East Coast Route from London Kings Cross to the north - and formerly to Edinburgh (although now truncated to Newcastle), as well as Midland Route operations from London St Pancras to the East Midlands. Both sets of services have been seen huge changes over the years as Pullman operations has cannibalised the Intercity market, with many of the destinations reachable via Pullman. The reduction in Leeds and Edinburgh services has freed up some capacity for more medium-range destinations; the core service from Kings Cross now sees hourly services to Lincoln, Leeds, Hull and Newcastle, with a fifth hourly service rotating around a number of smaller destinations. Similarly, services from St Pancras operate hourly to Derby & Sheffield, Nottingham, Corby and Leicester. The slower services (with faster trains via Pullman) has meant an increase in regional passengers however; an experimental Newcastle to Peterborough (via Leeds, Sheffield and Nottingham and a suite of smaller towns) has proved extremely successful. Voyager trains have now supplanted older rolling stock, and the transfer of Voyager trains from the London-Norwich route following it's handover to Anglia has allowed the Midland Route to start to receive Voyager units and replace very old locomotive hauled stock.
Midlands Service: 3 trains per hour, via Leicester; 2 to Derby & Sheffield, and 1 to Nottingham.
East Coast Service: 5 trains per hour, via Peterborough; 1 to Hull, 1 to Middlesbrough, Sunderland and Newcastle, 1 to Darlington, Durham and Newcastle, 1 to Leeds and Bradford, 1 to Lincoln.

------------------------
(*1) Roughly as per OTL.
(*2) 90mph as standard; the 1.5kV being less powerful than 25kV AC.
(*3) As evidenced throughout the TL.
(*4) It might sound like a stupid thing, but this was actually a significant set of work in OTL and often yielded great improvements as tight Victorian curves were straightened out, high speed point work installed etc etc.
(*5) During privatisation attempts, BR (in this TL) was forced to contract out several operations to the private sector, whilst also selling off some railway networks, although the full privatisation of BR was avoided.
(*6) This lack of power for higher speeds in part is what drove Pullman (with it's high speed 25kV AC) to extend further north.
(*7) Regenerative braking was possible from the early days of 1.5kV DC as it's very simple; just run the motor in reverse to slow the train and feed the DC power back in to the overhead lines (although feeding excess power back in to the electrical grid is much more complex - hence why we've seen flywheel energy storage systems crop up in this TL).
(*8) As used on Virgin Trains.
(*9) Assuming most people pre-order in order to get the food faster, this also means that most food can be prepared before the train reaches the station at which the passenger boards, allowing for demand to be spread out instead of a mad dash before the final station.
(*10) Smartphone app seems an obvious evolution given Intercity's desire to be a "surface airline" - look at the aviation market.
(*11) I doubt you'd get a media library like onboard a plane - people won't be at their seats for long enough, but a re-transmission of free-to-air TV channels seems possible for first class.
(*12) A frequent traveller programme seems to have been a major aim of Intercity; peak season tickets will likely grant some of the same perks, but frequent travellers will get the perks whilst Intercity gets better customer information.
(*12A) Covered in a separate Pullman chapter.
(*12B) Sleeper Services were covered a way back, and I'm gently considering a Royal Train chapter
(*13) Previously mentioned in a high speed Southeastern chapter; the short journey time using the London high speed link means the route from Birmingham is better suited for commuter options (operating in to Snow Hill though).
(*14) As mentioned in a previous chapter.

PS: Lots of little changes in the map if you fancy hunting! :)
 
Does Brian May still do the song for them?

I see Worcester does not get on the InterCity route.

So there is no separate Intercity services covering the South Coast it is all part of West Coast? That's one Big operating area!

Royal Trains would be a fun chapter. Perhaps add trains like the Orient Express in there too?

Is there any effect on pop culture for a stronger surviving BR? I doubt it would save Freddie Mercury or end the Troubles, but would trains be more preverlant in media, or even a show set on-board one?
 
Just looking at that map makes me think how inconvenient it could be to get from eastern Scotland to the north of England. It looks like, for example, to get from Edinburgh to York would need a change at Birmingham.
 
A challenge would be to save this railway: Invergarry and Fort Augustus Railway until tourism kicks in.

It would be one amazing scenic railway if it had survived.

Plus it would be more fun than the dangerous A road down Loch Ness, or the 12hr rail journey to Inverness from Ft. William via Glasgow and Perth!
 
A challenge would be to save this railway: Invergarry and Fort Augustus Railway until tourism kicks in.

It would be one amazing scenic railway if it had survived.

Plus it would be more fun than the dangerous A road down Loch Ness, or the 12hr rail journey to Inverness from Ft. William via Glasgow and Perth!
From what I remember, it was said to be a line that should've have happened as it was flop of a line though had the original plan to take the line all the way to Inverness happened then it likely would have done better, all that put kibosh was the HR and the GNSR, mainly the former, saying no to more competition from the likes of the NB getting too close for call in the area.

That all said, I agree with you that it would've been some amazing line had be been able to make it's original proposal.
 

Devvy

Donor
Does Brian May still do the song for them?

I see Worcester does not get on the InterCity route.

So there is no separate Intercity services covering the South Coast it is all part of West Coast? That's one Big operating area!

Royal Trains would be a fun chapter. Perhaps add trains like the Orient Express in there too?

Is there any effect on pop culture for a stronger surviving BR? I doubt it would save Freddie Mercury or end the Troubles, but would trains be more preverlant in media, or even a show set on-board one?

Unless I've misunderstood you; there was no "Intercity South Coast" in OTL; it was all part of Network South East (bar the Gatwick Express, which here became part of Southeastern during reforms). ICWC is a massive subsector, but it is basically all trains running through Birmingham so it kinda makes sense. Pop culture; probably, but no idea at the moment! :)

Just looking at that map makes me think how inconvenient it could be to get from eastern Scotland to the north of England. It looks like, for example, to get from Edinburgh to York would need a change at Birmingham.

Due to the situation at Newcastle, and lots more services operating through Newcastle rather than terminating at it, to reduce platform requirements (given Pullman use of the station), you'd probably have a situation where the Carlisle-Newcastle semi express service would continue via Sunderland to M'boro. So Edinburgh to York could take a single change at Brum, but also could take a single change at Wigan, and use the Transpennine high speed services to access York. It's a bit more of a faff definitely; but that's the cost of taking Pullman north of the border. Rather than Intercity all the way, it'll be a change to Transpennine services.

A challenge would be to save this railway: Invergarry and Fort Augustus Railway until tourism kicks in.

It would be one amazing scenic railway if it had survived.

Plus it would be more fun than the dangerous A road down Loch Ness, or the 12hr rail journey to Inverness from Ft. William via Glasgow and Perth!
From what I remember, it was said to be a line that should've have happened as it was flop of a line though had the original plan to take the line all the way to Inverness happened then it likely would have done better, all that put kibosh was the HR and the GNSR, mainly the former, saying no to more competition from the likes of the NB getting too close for call in the area.

That all said, I agree with you that it would've been some amazing line had be been able to make it's original proposal.

Sorry to say, but it's still gone here. According to wiki, it ended passenger services in the 1930s, far before the PoD, and freight services only lasted until the early 1950s. Would be a spectacular railway, I've been down that route myself, but not to be sadly.

Also; don't expect more updates for a while unfortunately. Devvy-Infant #2 is now with us and I've obviously got my hands full somewhat! :)
 
Good luck with the baby there @Devvy

Shame about the Invergarry & Fort Augustus - if the trackbed still existed before the 80's caravan parks starting popping up, is there a chance of a rebuild ITTL?
 
2020-Finale-7-Pullman

Devvy

Donor
2020 Roundup: Intercity Pullman

pullman-advert.jpg

Pullman has come a long way from it's origins, and shaved a lot of time off the timetable.

The Intercity Pullman subsector dates back to the early 1980s, and operates British Rail's high speed route network. An evolution of what was originally an "Advanced Passenger Train", operating on normal BR tracks, the requirements for signalling and high power as well as difficulties in integrating the train in to standard operation (with braking distances and tilting profile) led to the train being moved to work on a dedicated high speed route. This allowed the route to diverge from British Rail standard specifications, and use new signalling and power systems, as well as allowing a higher usage of the route by high speed trains without slower trains getting in the way. With the first segment of the network opening in the early 1980s, from London to the new international airport at Cublington (now Britannia Airport), Nottingham, Sheffield, Manchester and Liverpool, the Pullman service became extremely popular - it was a new, modern, very fast way to travel between many of England's principle cities.

Such popularity inevitably led to calls for the network to be extended. The first came around quickly and was a short extension north to serve Yorkshire, bringing Rotherham, Wakefield and Leeds in to the Pullman network. It was available quickly due to the ease of construction - the route made significant use of existing tracks which vastly simplified the project. During the economic troubles of the 1980s and early 1990s, that limited extension (again mostly using existing railway routes) was the limit of what would be seen due to limited funding from Westminster. It wouldn't be until a new Government swept to power, determined to put their stamp on the country, that Pullman would be extended further north. The new link, a mix of brand new route and repurposed existing tracks, allowed Pullman to reach Newcastle and then north of the border to Edinburgh and Glasgow. New trainsets, with better acceleration and more capacity allowed more passengers than ever to use Pullman at faster speeds, while the older Pullman trains modernised and re-engineered to work on British Rail's Great Western services from London to Bristol and South Wales, helping to spread the benefits around the United Kingdom. Birmingham remained the loser in the Pullman competition, but it's position so close to London meant that classic Intercity - and even Southeastern - services offered a fast and intensive service between the two cities, and most other regional towns and cities (*1).

pullman-times.jpg

Current timetable operations (*2).

Post 2010, and the Pullman network is well in to profit-generating operations, there are no further major Pullman extensions firmly planned. Loadings and profits continue to be high especially on the North-West Pullman route, at approximately an average 85% against capacity, as it operates to Sheffield, Manchester and Liverpool. Loadings are lower on Yorkshire and Scottish Pullman services, with around 65% usage against capacity (*3). Proposals surface occasionally to connect Birmingham to the Pullman system, however they always fail in some regard - proposals to connect Birmingham towards London fail on Pullman capacity limits, with the London stretch operating at "sensible capacity" (ie. the remaining capacity is safeguarded for timetabling & operational reasons) and proposals to connect Birmingham to the routes north fail on economic tests with there being insufficient demand. More wild ideas have included connecting South Wales and East Anglia, but have got little further than an MP or two. More outlandish ideas have included an Irish Sea Tunnel to connect to Dublin and Belfast - something which has attracted studies over the years even during the time of Ireland's status inside the United Kingdom. Such an idea is potentially feasible, and excluding construction costs, financially interested - but the huge cost of such a link precludes any real interest, at least in the short term. Ideas for the future remain firmly within the realms of "improving the existing system" and optimisations. The Pullman 2 trains were proving popular once more, although the seating policy and pricing matrix for the services (somewhat similar to airline models, and European high speed services) was less popular, as tickets had to be purchased for a specific train which reduced flexibility - unless you were a first class passenger whose tickets allowed easier changes.

  • Improvements to the Scottish Pullman route (*4). This would entail a joint Scotrail-Intercity project to overhaul the "Calton Tunnels". The original tunnels would be handed over to Scotrail for their operation, relining both tunnels and using a single track in each bore for Scotrail operations and thus removing the single track bottleneck. This would allow a much more intensive Scotrail service to the east and south of Edinburgh if so desired, with a potential doubling of service on suburban routes to Leith, North Berwick and Dunbar, and also the capacity to allow proposals to reinstate rail service to Haddington. Pullman would descend in to a new tunnel from Waverley station to Newcraighall where the dedicated Pullman alignment towards London begins. The tunnel would be built to a much wider diameter, therefore able to accommodate a newer generation of larger train in future.
  • Initial research work in the a "Pullman-3" train is ongoing, aimed at service roughly in the 2040s (*5). With platforms in place as they are, and capacity limits on the tracks, the only way of increasing capacity would be to offer double-deck trains in the future - although loading gauge limits would make this difficult in many areas of the network. Whilst this is one possibility being researched, the "conventional" alternative approach would see newer technologies implemented with the same passenger capacity, increasing performance whilst decreasing operating costs by using solid state batteries to capture more of the regenerative braking energy and thus smooth out electrical demands on the supplies. Newer electrical motors on each axle would improve acceleration (and regenerative deceleration), whilst newer interiors would decrease weight and thus improve acceleration and reduce power requirements.
  • A station at Leicester; through which Pullman currently operates through, but without stopping (*6). The former Leicester Central station was not retained for Pullman operation, much to the town's indignation, and has continued to be overlooked. With the growth in services, it's felt there is potentially the correct conditions for adding in a station at Leicester. Large obstacles remain however; a desire to have platform loops - ie. platforms away from the main running tracks in order to allow express services (ie. those to/from Scotland) to pass through without stopping is a challenge, whilst the lack of connectivity at the former Leicester Central site poses a challenge to onwards transit. There is a potential alternative site near the King Power Stadium, where the Ivanhoe Route crosses and platforms could be added. The capacity usage to towards London also place hurdles on introducing any new train services, and so any future Leicester station would need to be served by existing trains - most likely Leeds services due to lower passenger counts and a shorter distance.
leic-cen.jpg

Leicester Central station was formerly quite large - and destined to be reborn once more?

------------
(*1) Much of this is a short rehash of Pullman history we've seen through this TL. The lack of Pullman services I think will mean that Manchester will be more accepted as "England's Second City" (as horrific a prospect as that may seem to some board members! 🙂 ).
(*2) I have a large spreadsheet here where I attempted to calculate rough timetabled journey time. This factors in a) 3 minute station stops, b) acceleration and deceleration time, c) top speed of 250km/h, and d) by 2020 a 1% "recovery" time (given it's running on a dedicated route with no other trains). I think it's a reasonable model, but happy to comment / accept feedback if any of the times seem unlikely.
(*3) Again I calculated this with a large spreadsheet, converting OTL passenger numbers to Pullman route loadings, and then increasing based on better speed. The ability to individually sell train tickets "for an airline on wheels" on a per service basis also allows Intercity to sell cut-price tickets just before departure to fill out specific services will also help.
(*4) This would shave a few minutes off the timetable for Pullman, but importantly would also future-proof the route there for larger trains. It would also introduce significantly more capacity for Scotrail, who would presumably be the chief instigator of such a project.
(*5) Pullman-3 trains would potentially be double decker trains; initially introduced on the Leeds route as far fewer tunnels and difficult loading gauge areas on this route, and then used to serve Leicester as well as high capacity services for Nottingham and Britannia Airport. However, it's just initial research and development, and obviously a lot will depend on whether the route as a whole can accommodate taller trains, such as Nottingham tunnels etc etc. If not, I'd expect new technologies to be trialled, and then retrofitted to Pullman-2 trains during overhauls.
(*6) Fairly self explanatory. Personally I think any new Pullman station would probably be situated to the south on a new site so it can interface with the route from Leicester to Burton; people are likely to be using this to travel from home near Leicester to somewhere else, or business reasons to partners in Leicester (who are unlikely to be in the city centre) and thus likely to use taxis anyway. Such a location would also allow better parking for drivers.
 
Last edited:
Top