or just host Soyuz at Skylab B for some of that sweet,sweet international cooperation.Sending Skylab B would make sense if they canceled Skylab immediately after the failure.
Skip the Apollo Soyuz and use the remaining equipment at Skylab. This will give you two additional missions.
There is enough stuff left over for 1 or two missions, CSM 119 is in KSC and could be used, but idk if another is left aroundSending Skylab B would make sense if they canceled Skylab immediately after the failure.
Skip the Apollo Soyuz and use the remaining equipment at Skylab. This will give you two additional missions.
The problem with that was the expense of launching it, and it would only host one crewor just host Soyuz at Skylab B for some of that sweet,sweet international cooperation.
5 meters is my guessHow wide is the top stage of the N1? And for that how wide is the Zarya module? I wonder about the possibility of a Soviet Skylab, and what impact it might have for additional module width.
Blok-V is 7.59m wide at the base, 5.475m wide at the top, the fairing is 5.92m wideHow wide is the top stage of the N1? And for that how wide is the Zarya module? I wonder about the possibility of a Soviet Skylab, and what impact it might have for additional module width.
A drylab is better then wet lab, wetlabs would take a bunch of flights just to outfitBlok-V is 7.59m wide at the base, 5.475m wide at the top, the fairing is 5.92m wide
Blok-V-III is about 8m wide.
Zarya is 6m wide at its largest portion (about 12m long) [although now looking at the diagram it may be closer to 5.5m], and about 3m wide in its forward section (also about 12m long); its wide module is therefore about 80-90% the size of the Skylab orbital workshop, but its forward portion is slightly larger than the Airlock Module and Docking Adapter of Skylab.
And it's still smaller than the full MKBS station which would have been at least 1,000 m^3 large
Knowing NASA and the US, it will still be hugely expensiveNow I'm thinking what a cheap alternative to Freedom could be.
If we assume a clean slate project that is not a reactivation of Skylab.
Not...really, no, wetlabs suck and power, life support, and heat rejection matter way more than raw volume.The best bang for buck idea is Boldy goings ET wetlab
Considering ESA is in a situation where it is planning on building not one, but two columbus, with the Japanese participating in, I'd say the cheapest alternative is to buy a third one, and work off that. IRL MTFF was supposed to be able to berth with both shuttle and Freedom, first requirement would probably stay, second not, but it doesn't seem hard to get that capability, besides the Arm is integrated with Columbus/MTFF, so it'd be the active one in berthing. There were IRL proposals for an european space station built off the MTFF, here you can have a minimum American space station built off Columbus, with a module derived from the power-and-docking node attached to it.Now I'm thinking what a cheap alternative to Freedom could be.
If we assume a clean slate project that is not a reactivation of Skylab.
It's interesting.Considering ESA is in a situation where it is planning on building not one, but two columbus, with the Japanese participating in, I'd say the cheapest alternative is to buy a third one, and work off that. IRL MTFF was supposed to be able to berth with both shuttle and Freedom, first requirement would probably stay, second not, but it doesn't seem hard to get that capability, besides the Arm is integrated with Columbus/MTFF, so it'd be the active one in berthing. There were IRL proposals for an european space station built off the MTFF, here you can have a minimum American space station built off Columbus, with a module derived from the power-and-docking node attached to it.
Ya, Drylabs are better, for wetlabs it varies on use, for a lunar base the tanks are usable volume, while earth orbit wetlab stations are a bitchNot...really, no, wetlabs suck and power, life support, and heat rejection matter way more than raw volume.
That was basically a solar array attached to the Canadarm, the issue with bigger spacelab modules is the fact the Shuttle needs to land, bigger modules means higher weight and center of mass requirementsCurrently, when I think about a concept derived from the Orbital Power Module.
Initially intended as an additional source of energy for Spacelab. Over time, it receives additional modules for longer research, and then residential modules.
It depends how minimum, my idea of two columbus's and a solar array would be good enough for science missions, permanent habitation would need a third moduleConsidering ESA is in a situation where it is planning on building not one, but two columbus, with the Japanese participating in, I'd say the cheapest alternative is to buy a third one, and work off that. IRL MTFF was supposed to be able to berth with both shuttle and Freedom, first requirement would probably stay, second not, but it doesn't seem hard to get that capability, besides the Arm is integrated with Columbus/MTFF, so it'd be the active one in berthing. There were IRL proposals for an european space station built off the MTFF, here you can have a minimum American space station built off Columbus, with a module derived from the power-and-docking node attached to it.
I meant this.That was basically a solar array attached to the Canadarm, the issue with bigger spacelab modules is the fact the Shuttle needs to land, bigger modules means higher weight and center of mass requirements
That space station would be small, considering NASA's budget would likely still be stagnant but just a bit bigger then OTL due to the Soviet supremacy, i doubt NASA would sacrifice lunar budgets for a LEO stationAn international Moon base could be cool.
Though I could still see a space station as well.
A Zarya station with nuclear reactor that power Ion engines could do Venus-Mars Flyby missionsn't the Zarya module built with interplanetary travel in mind? Maybe Glushko could pull a stunt like that for a Venus-Mars flyby? Zarya 3 worked for 4 years without problems so... It would also expand on the OTL of how a cosmonaut went to space under the Soviet Union flag and returned under the Russian one.