2010 US Presidential Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
washingtonpost.com

May 31, 2018

The Failure of Shallick and the End of Walkenism

In 2010, after 12 years out of the White House, the GOP regained its footing with the electoral victory of Glen Allen Walken, the former Speaker of the House of Representatives who famously served as Acting President in 2003 after the kidnapping of former First Daughter Zoey Bartlet. Walken campaigned on ending the war in Kazakhstan and trimming away the fat and excess of the spending-happy Santos Administration.

America bought in, and on election night, Glen Allen Walken was elected to be the 44th President of the United States. During his first term, the economy flourished and American troops began to withdraw from Kazakhstan. In 2014, President Walken survived a tougher than expected challenge in Democratic nominee Senator Fitzimmons, who inauspiciously became the first Democrat to carry Florida and Ohio and still be defeated. Walken's second term was much tougher than his first, and in 2016, a new challenge arrived.

When the time came for Walken to step down, who would succeed him?

Would it be faithful Vice President Liz Clark? Or brilliant Chief of Staff Henry Shallick?

In a nightmare scenario for the Walken wing of the GOP, both became candidates in the Republican Party's primary. After a personal attack towards her son, Clark withdrew from the race. President Walken was reportedly mixed about her decision, wanting to hand his Vice President the keys to the Oval Office, but relieved that he wouldn't have to make a choice between his Vice President and his top advisor. Clark's withdrawal ensured that the Walken Republicans would have a clear standard bearer in Henry Shallick, someone who was well respected within the White House and the national party. For President Walken, everything seemed set.

Until it wasn't.

No one thought this would be easy. It's incredibly rare for the same party to hold power for three consecutive terms. The last time it happened, when former President Santos shocked Arnold Vinick in 2006, was due to a perfect storm that included a nuclear meltdown in California, a surprising win in South Carolina, and a narrow decision in Nevada, which ultimately turned out to be the tipping point. Chief of Staff Shallick knew about the challenges he would face in November, and with the support of the establishment, the Shallick campaign, after a strong performance the same night Senator Sam Seaborn clinched the Democratic nomination, was just 40 votes away from its own victory. Pennsylvania, the largest remaining state, had 74 delegates. Shallick held a huge lead in the state. Nothing could stop the Shallick train from reaching the station.

One thing did. Indiana.

A heavily contested Indiana primary sent the GOP into a whirlwind. First, Indiana was won by Shallick, until it wasn't, until the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Lang, ruled that the votes Governor Peter Gault, Shallick's biggest opponent, were contesting were not valid, ultimately placing Indiana in the Shallick column. As much as this felt like a victory for Shallick and the Walkenites, it quickly turned into defeat. A populist wave rose in Pennsylvania, carrying Governor Gault to victory there. Shallick's frantic pivot to Nebraska and South Dakota proved not to be enough as Gault nearly ran the table, securing wins in both states, With Durham winning in Oregon, guaranteeing a contested convention, the first since 2006's Democratic Convention, which, after several ballots, the Santos-McGarry ticket was nominated. In another blow, Indiana's GOP chair, Patsy Sewell, announced that Indiana's 54 delegates would cross the floor back to Gault in the event of a brokered convention.

Sewell's announcement hurts Shallick even more, now that he managed to lose Pennsylvania, Oregon, South Dakota, and Nebraska. When the convention goes to a second ballot, Shallick delegate count will drop 54 votes — from 1,241 to 1,187 — while Gault's will increase 54, from 1,127 to 1,181, leaving an even thinner margin between the two. Gault heads into the convention with a full head of steam and even more momentum, with victories in three of four states. Shallick comes in as the deflated loser of four straight. Because of his failure to seal the deal, establishment support in Tampa to secure the nomination could dampen grassroots enthusiasm in key rural areas, effectively handing the White House to Senator Seaborn and the Democrats.

President Walken pinned his hopes and his legacy on Chief of Staff Shallick. Chief of Staff Shallick couldn't deliver and now the hopes of President Walken and the GOP establishment are hanging on by a thread.

So long, Walkenism. We'll never forget you.
 
Last edited:
Just one thing the Zoe Bartlet kidnapping was 2003 not 2002 (although I say May, the show couldn't make up it's mind between May or July!!) probably not helped by the fact that the production team changed between those episodes (end of series 4 & start of series 5).
Also Congressman Durham won Oregon not Gault.
 
Just one thing the Zoe Bartlet kidnapping was 2003 not 2002 (although I say May, the show couldn't make up it's mind between May or July!!) probably not helped by the fact that the production team changed between those episodes (end of series 4 & start of series 5).
Also Congressman Durham won Oregon not Gault.
Thanks. It's amazing how one's memory distorts things. My favorite Season 4 episodes revolve around the election, so everything got conflated into 2002.
 
upload_2017-2-8_14-55-36-png.307359

Wednesday June 6th 2018

Shallick ready to offer deal to Gault & Durham

Henry Shallick is ready to make an offer to both his opponents Kansas Governor Peter Gault and Californian Congressman Will Durham to try and prevent a deadlocked convention and protacted fight for delegates at the RNC in Tampa next month.

Shallick after talks with the RNC appointed "trouble-shooter" Oliver Babbish is we understand prepared to make Will Durham his running mate and make Peter Gault, Attorney General in a Shallick Administration if they release there delegates on the first ballot.

We understand representatives of the Durham campaign have been present in the talks, but not the Congressman directly, whilst the Gault campaign has point blank refused to take part in them.
 
upload_2017-2-8_14-55-36-png.307359

Wednesday June 6th 2018

Shallick ready to offer deal to Gault & Durham

Henry Shallick is ready to make an offer to both his opponents Kansas Governor Peter Gault and Californian Congressman Will Durham to try and prevent a deadlocked convention and protacted fight for delegates at the RNC in Tampa next month.

Shallick after talks with the RNC appointed "trouble-shooter" Oliver Babbish is we understand prepared to make Will Durham his running mate and make Peter Gault, Attorney General in a Shallick Administration if they release there delegates on the first ballot.

We understand representatives of the Durham campaign have been present in the talks, but not the Congressman directly, whilst the Gault campaign has point blank refused to take part in them.

Gault campaign reaction to deal:

 
upload_2017-2-8_14-55-36-png.307359

Friday June 8th 2018

Gault hung up phone on President Walken as he urged him to take deal with Shallick

Kansas Governor Peter Gault hung up the phone on President Walken last night after a remarkable phone call in which the President is belived to have urged the Governor to accept a deal brokered with his former Chief of Staff and Congressman Will Durham in which both candidates would release their delegates on the first ballot at the RNC in Tampa next month, in exchange for Durham becoming Shallick's running-mate and Gault the Attorney General in a Shallick Administration.

Gault was believed to be furious when he heard of the deal on Wednesday, with his campaign refusing to answer questions on it. Gault was called by both Oliver Babbish and Congressman Durham during Thursday and both times he refused point blank to take the calls, leading to President Walken calling Gault at his home in Topeka. The President is understood to have urged Gault to take the deal for the "good of the party", the call is belived to have got very heated, with the Governor slamming the phone down and ending the call.

Within minutes the Gault Press team then briefed the media on the phone call with them pushing the line "the establishment is pushing for a stitch-up deal, the delegates in Tampa must decide, no-one else who our nominee should be now".
 
Last edited:
upload_2017-2-8_14-55-36-png.307359

Friday June 8th 2018

Gault hung up phone on President Walken as he urged him to take deal with Shallick

Kansas Governor Peter Gault hung up the phone on President Walken last night after a remarkable phone call in which the President is belived to have urged the Governor to accept a deal brokered with his former Chief of Staff and Congressman Will Durham in which both candidates would release their delegates on the first ballot at the RNC in Tampa next Florida, in exchange for Durham becoming Shallick's running-mate and Gault the Attorney General in a Shallick Administration.

Gault was believed to be furious when he heard of the deal on Wednesday, with his campaign refusing to answer questions on it. Gault was called by both Oliver Babbish and Congressman Durham during Thursday and both times he refused point blank to take the calls, leading to President Walken calling Gault at his home in Topeka. The President is understood to have urged Gault to take the deal for the "good of the party", the call is belived to have got very heated, with the Governor slamming the phone down and ending the call.

Within minutes the Gault Press team then briefed the media on the phone call with them pushing the line "the establishment is pushing for a stitch-up deal, the delegates in Tampa must decide, no-one else who our nominee should be now".

Why do I get the feeling that this is the action where Gault went to far? I can't remember exactly, but if I remember right, Walken is quite popular at this stage. Antagonizing him might not be the best thing to do.
 
What happens to the Gault train, if Durham turns over his delegates to Shallick, in exchange for the veep spot? Gault better hope a stampede doesn't ensue. A Shallick-Durham pairing might be viewed as the ideal ticket to counteract Seaborn-Hollis. Gault might be shutout in the final analysis, have little to show for his efforts. If memory serves me correctly, Durham has 192 delegates, and the Vice presidency might be a tempting possibility for Durham. Gault doesn't seem to be interested in any sort of dialogue, which suggests an immaturity and impractability; dialogue might resolve differences.
 
Last edited:
He's got nothing to lose at this stage; it's scorched earth; but a 3rd party run is problematic; his support base is diffuse and if he attempts to set up a 3rd party run after July, he looks & sounds like a sore loser; also the deadlines to registering on the ballot may have passed in many States. Also if he goes 3rd party route, he's finished in the Republican party. His only options is fight at the convention. Allow the Shallick-Durham scenario to take place. Stay put & serve out his term as Governor, If Shallick loses, do a Goldwater, Reagan & Nixon. Wait four years and challenge Seaborn in 2022. He can use the "we wuz robbed" argument and lay the ground work for a more successful run for the GOP nomination.
 
Or he could attempt a grassroots uprising during the midterms, trying to unseat both Democrats and Republicans à la Steve Bannon. But we're still far off from that.
 
Gault's core argument that it is the delegates should decide the nominee not the candidates in a "back-room deal". If he loses at the convention in a fair fight, he would accept that, but his push since Indiana is that the Republican establishment is out to stitch him and the people that voted for him up.
 
Well Mark Bunny you may have a point, but the delegates were selected through the primary process were they not? the rules prescribe that the delegates are pledged to the candidate who won them. So are we to believe that those delegates pledged to Gault are more pure of heart, while those pledged to Shallick or Durham are bogus? So by that logic, Gault wants or expects Shallick & Durham to release there delegates, while he Gault holds on to his. Why doesn't Gault release his delegates and have a free for all, and let every delegate have there choice, so then there is "no stitch up". Gault fears that Shallick and Durham will do a deal, where Durham releases his 192 delegates and guarantees Shallick the nomination and Durham gets the Vice presidency in exchange. What's wrong with that? Both Shallick and Durham won votes and delegate's, as did Gault. I think Gault has a "sore loser" mentality and the likelihood is that there will be a Shallick-Durham deal.
 
Well my money is on a Shallick-Durham ticket, coming out of Tampa; while Gault and his supporter's might view the outcome as a "stitch up", but politics is all about the "art of the deal".....in other words, making the impossible possible, if Gault doesn't understand or get that, then how the heck did he function as Governor of Kansas? I think events at the Democrats convention, might have a sobering effect on Republicans and that they will start to focus on who might be stronger. Time will tell.
 
Perhaps, but a safe convention doesn't mean they'll win. The DNC was in chaos in 2006 over Russell and Santos while the Republicans smoothly nominated Vinick. And Santos still won the election. As another Sorkin Republican character said: "It's a long way to next November."

I have another question: Is the Seaborn camp ever going to respond to Gault's presence in San Francisco? It could set him apart if he came out praising Gault for his open-handed approach to the LGBT community.
 
I think all eyes are on the Shallick-Gault drama, probably Seaborn is grateful; when the Democrats convene to officially nominate him and Hollis there won't be the fatigue affect. A blessing in disguise.
 
upload_2017-2-8_14-55-36-png.307359

Tuesday June 12th 2018

Durham: "It's no deal without Gault"

Congressman Will Durham told the press today that he was "prepared" to be Henry Shallick's running-mate as log as Kansas Governor Peter Gault's "success" was "acknowledged" in any deal ahead of the Republican National Convention in Tampa next Month.

"I have my differences with Governor Gault but we have three people in the running for the nomination, and his clear success should be acknowledged, and he must play a part in a united Republican team" adding "it's no deal with out Governor Gault, we would be heading into the lection with a divided party, and would hand the White House to the ultra Liberal Senator Seaborn".

Governor Gault has refused to accept any deal with the other two candidates, even ending a call with President Walken last Thursday in an abrupt fashion saying that he believes that the decision on the nominee should only be taken by the delegates themselves.
 
Last edited:
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top